• Inflation Blindfold Conspiracy

    Posted on September 4th, 2011 James 4 comments

    Right now we have at least 14 million unemployed and growing. There is a high probability that unemployment could exceed its historic norm of 5 percent to 6 percent for several more years.

    Our consumer price index (CPI) is way up. Our consumption of food, energy, clothing, recreation, education, transportation, toys, cosmetics, etc. makes up 58% of the Consumer Price Index with the housing market making up the other 42% and we know housing is down.  I don’t know if our leaders have gone to the grocery store lately or do a family budget and look at food as a line item but my family does  and what we are seeing is that prices are going up.

    Everything is going up as we track our budget whether it’s education, health or life insurance, medical care, or our most precious groceries and water.  Yet the government keeps telling us there’s no inflation. Where are they shopping and are they doing it blindfolded?

    The formula is quite simple and no wool pulled over your eyes should be able to keep you from the truth; even if media assists our government in this blindfolding experiment. First, our government borrows money from the Federal Reserve.Then the Federal Reserves says “sure we can help you out” and they loan the government some money. However, the Federal Reserve does not have any ‘real’ money but have control of the monetary system in this country and get the Treasury to fire up the printing presses and manufacture some money; or debt notes if you prefer.

    The final stage is is where these dollars (debt notes) are created out of thin air and it gets its value by draining from existing money. Every time this new money or debt notes are manufactured and released, it takes away some of the value of the current money you’re holding; in essence it is stolen.

    An example of how this effects you would be; you have $10,000 in a CD or the bank and most prognosticators agree the real effect of inflation is about 9.6%. Some even believe inflation it is running as high as 13%. However, we’ll stay with 9.6% to be conservative; perhaps even naive. So if you have this $10,000 in a CD or bank it would look like this

    The Value of $10,000 with 9.6% inflation imposed on it for 5 years.

     

     

    Ultimately the purchasing power of your savings; never mind the little interest it might acquire as it would have taxes to lessen it out. The purchasing power would be reduced by 36.8% in just five short years. By 2016 you will be left with just $6,323 out of your original $10,000 and have lost $3,677 just by doing nothing. This means things are not always about return which is nice and should be sought in tax-free environment going forward. But equally important is to consistently add to what you have and not lose anything. In other words, you need to protect principal, consistently and regularly add to your pot and try to eliminate as much tax imposed on it as legally possible. This 3 step process is a simple formula for wealth but many will not take advantage as it requires self-discipline and “know-how” on protecting principal and eliminating tax.

    We teach seminars on smart money management and how to acquire corporate credit to fund your business aspirations and really succeed in what is now some of the toughest years in our country’s history. You have to ask this question – am I taking the right steps necessary to be able to retire? If you are not you will be working for the rest of your life and never taste true freedom which is to work on your own terms and time frame or choose to not work at all and know your family. Know  your family folks; how many of you can truly say you spend quality time with them and “know” them. I bet the number is resoundingly LOW.

    We can help you as it is our life’s mission to reduce retirement poverty in this country and get those on track who will take the ” RED” pill rather than the “BLUE” pill (“ignorance is bliss”) and choose to not stay blindfolded in the dark but wake up.

    James Burns

    (866) 544-8825 Ext. 1 Office

    Share
  • Retirement after the great recession – will it still be possible?

    Posted on March 13th, 2011 James 3 comments

    I wrote an article a few years ago that was published in the OC Metro in Orange County, California called Uncle Sam’s Snake Oil.” This article was designed to wake up all the sheeple (that is a half person half sheep) that is just following along and believing that what you’ve been told to be true is true.

    There used to be the 3-legged stool for retirement but then the company funded pension went way and the last two legs which were only supplemental have been used to fund a lifestyle after work and has become disastrous. The other two legs are Social Security and the 401k plan which was designed to supplement your retirement and can be decent if you get a significant company match but those are going away.   The real key here is that as our deficit rises beyond $14,000,000,000,000 trillion that is a long number isn’t it? As things rise ever second, we know the only solution is to raise taxes and most likely back to the tax brackets of the 1990s where the top was at 39.6%. If you add your state tax, in California it is another 9.3%, your at 48.9% of your income just to taxes to pay this incredible debt down. That means anyone earning $250,000 or more was taxed as this rate and we hear a lot about that $250,000 income today. However a family of 3 or more needs at least that much just to stay above water in their live in various parts of California s housing and goods and services are explosively high. The proposed Obamacare or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is going to send our taxes to at least these levels. We now have Homeland Security costs, War, underfunded benefits (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) and this is a recipe of inevitable higher taxes. In 1993 the family filing  jointly and earning $89,000 to $140,000 was taxed at a 31% rate which is just 4% shy of the highest current tax bracket for multi-millionaires and we are destined to go back to such a rate.

    All of this legwork does not even account for how things really work on deferred pension plans and few Americans realized how they are going to be taxed on their retirement plans until they arrive at retirement only to be horrified. Millions run out of money and end up work in their eighties in fast food restaurants or as greeters in front of discount department stores.

    So here is a break-down of an average person putting away $4,000 per year for 30 years and reaping that huge tax-deductible benefit and how he ends up paying 10x in taxes back to the government.

    Break down of taxes on deferred program

    This link depicts what it would look like to save $40,800 over the 30 years prior to retirement only to pay $532,800 in taxes over the time from age 65 to 85. As you can see that little savings in tax was no where near what you still end up paying, hence the perception of the deferred plan is snake oil.

    How do these numbers stack up

    We want people to know you have to start finding some form of tax-free strategy or you’ll be penniless in a few years into retirement and back out looking for work just to make ends meet. Most do not qualify for a ROTH and you can only put away $5,000 per year which takes forever to get any real build up but there are strategies for the small business owner or solo practitioner to use 401k ROTH strategies…this is way too long of a conversation for this article.

    There are muni bonds but which municipality do you feel comfortable with? Most of them are running their budgets like a ponzi and robbing Peter to pay Paul. Even though the interest paid on a municipal bond is tax-exempt, a holder can recognize gain or loss that is subject to federal income tax on the sale of such a bond, just as in the case of a taxable bond. I see a little too much risk in these going forward but a few might not be a bad thing. Unfortunately some folks have turned 95% of their wealth holdings into these which could give a whole new meaning to the word “junk bond.”

    The last frontier is exploring tax codes to find access to places to build tax-free and we find that in 7702a which is for life insurance. Now contrary to popular opinion, insurance is not all about you dying. In fact it can provide one of the last vehicles to grow money tax deferred and access it tax-free if designed properly. The caveat is that you must fund for a few years and be consistent like anything else in life. Many let their policies lapse and then the cash values go to paying insurance costs rather than being allocated to a savings component linked to one of our stock indexes.  As I’ve shown before, if you understand the equivalent taxable yield, you’ll understand that if you only did 5.5% in return tax-free that is the equivalent of 7.65%, depending on your tax bracket…it could be a little better if your in a higher tax bracket.

    The insurance approach also allows you to pass on a death benefit to loved ones and if you don’t have anyone who loves you then think about it as a final expense policy to cover the costs of sending you to the great beyond which can cost anywhere from $15,000 and UP.  You can be covered for disability and terminal illness and have supplemental tax-free retiree income all with one policy. For folks who don’t qualify for ROTH IRA, can’t do the solo 401k ROTH or have already done as much muni bonds as you’re going to risk; the properly structured ‘savings grade’ life insurance policy may provide a unique combative tool to slay the retirement dragon.

    Unpoverishingly,

    James Burns

    Tax Free Now

     

    Share
  • Why Sabotage your Retirement?

    Posted on January 22nd, 2011 James 1 comment

    There are five destroyers of wealth.

    1. Taxes

    2. Inflation

    3. Procrastination

    4. Expenses

    5. Debt

    So if we know these five exist that eat away our gains and slow our progress, then we know where not to invest. Debt and procrastination are personal things but the other three can be avoided. The typical vehicle most people use are mutual funds. There are now more mutual funds than there are stocks on the exchanges so one has to ask why. This is because of the tremendous money that is harvested off of them by greedy financial institutions.

    How do fund expenses affect you? Well, with the expense ratio, which averages 1.6% per year, sales charges of 0.5%, turnover generated portfolio transactions costs of 0.7% and opportunity costs of 0.3%—when funds hold cash rather than remain fully invested in stocks— the average mutual fund investor loses 3.1% of their investment returns every year just on fees. While this might not seem like much on the surface, costs and fees alone could consume 31% of a 10% market return. Think about that. You could be losing almost a third of your return before it’s even taxed. You’re losing a third of your return just for the cost of maintaining your investment. Add in the 1.5% capital gains tax bill that the average fund investor pays each year and that figure shoots up to 46% of your return being lost to fees and expenses, nearly half of a potential 10% return. When you hear that, don’t you feel like you’re taking one or two steps back instead of going forward?

    Taking what we now know, the best place to avoid expenses would be an index fund but if we buy the index inside a life insurance chassis, then we can eliminate the taxes under the Internal Revenue Code Section 7702 which allows tax-free build-up and tax-free distributions back to yourself because it is characterized as a loan. Now that we’ve eliminated two more destroyers the only one is inflation. As long as you can earn an internal rate or return that out paces the 3% of inflation which is possible when you have the right product you can eliminate all 5 destroyers of wealth and get so much further ahead.

    If you want more information look for the book “The 3 Secrets of Wealth” on Amazon or contact the author of this blog.

    Save Tax Free Now

    Share
  • Tax Free Retirement Cash Flow

    Posted on August 10th, 2009 James 3 comments

    Overfunding is a strategy that focuses on accumulating cash in the policy rather than paying for the death benefit which is the payout to your loved one’s when you pass away. This approach leverages the highest policy premium that is allowed with the lowest life insurance death benefit so that your cash accumulation exceeds your policy net insurance costs over at least 10 years. There are fundamentally 4 steps to determining the combination of maximum premiums and minimum death benefits necessary to selecting the most leveraged indexed universal life policy:


    1.

    First, determine the person’s maximum premium commitment over a minimum of ten years or more. The premium amount selected should be an amount that they can make regularly whether it is a monthly or annual payment and does not strap their cash flow. Universal life insurance policies offer flexible premium payments, but to get the maximum leverage you have to stay on course with a premium payment.

    2.

    Secondly, determine the minimum insurance face amount and payment commitment along with your age and gender to make sure the numbers work based on your particulars. Most insurance illustration provide the actual premium amount limits that meet the internal revenue code minimum requirements.

    3.

    Next, go over the internal rate of return (IRR) of the policy to ensure you’ll be getting the full benefit of the tax-free accumulation versus what an ordinary investment would receive outside of this tax-free environment. Some agent’s illustrate way too high like 8% which is unrealistic. We usually do ours at 5.25% and still kick the pants off other investments.

    4. Finally, you must pay close attention to the maximum premiums allowable under the  Internal Revenue Code which is referred to as the seven-pay premium limitation.[1] As long as the total premiums for any seven-year period are equal to or less than the maximum allowable premiums for the seven-pay test,[2] you’ll be able to access the cash values in the policy at any time, tax-free and relatively liquid.

    In essence, a life insurance contract that fails to meet the seven-pay test will be classified as a modified endowment contract (MEC). The seven-pay test is not met if the accumulated amount paid at any time during the first seven years is more than the total of the net level premiums that would normally have been paid on or before such time if the contract provided for paid-up future benefits after payment of seven level annual premiums

    Want to see if this is a fit for you? If you’re healthy it may very well be a great tool in your arsenal to slay the bailout dragon for your retirement.


    [1] . IRC §7702A as part of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (TAMRA).

    [2] . I.R.C.§7702A(b).

    Share
  • Tax Free Income for Life

    Posted on September 14th, 2008 James No comments

    I’ve been working on my new program which is going to be essential as Congress is likely to shift the entire marginal tax rate making your deferred plan (IRA or 401(k)) obsolete. You’ll want to take a look at our two vehicle system to build up tax-free.

    One of the vehicles is the Solo-401(k) ROTH self-directed plan. This vehicles does not have income limitations on the $165,000 for a couple filing jointly the way the ROTH IRA does. It is designed for solo-practitioners, those without employees or contractors or part-time people.

    Since it is ROTH you pay your taxes up front but never pay again on the build-up or when you take monies out in the future. Traditional deferred plans allow you to defer taxes but get hammered when you retire if you are in a higher tax bracket and without tax deductions to offset which is uniformly the case for a retiree.

    You can contribute up to 25% of compensation and additional catch-up is available for those 50 or older. A $41,000 annual limit applies and is indexed in the future up to 2010 unless the new regime changes things when they are sworn in as President and one could be higher than the other. A cap of $205,000 on compensation  was in force as of 2004 and is indexed up to 2010. The benefit is that you can set aside more tax-free money in the solo-401(k) ROTH than other plan choices and if it is self-directed, you do have to remain victim to what the market provides as you can have numerous choices for guranteed returns that are not connected to the market at all.

    Remember this is just one half of a dynamic duo that provides for tax-free income for life. You’ll want to examine the seld-directed arena so that you’re not held to just mutual funds and other market connected investments that are roller coaster driven because they are up and down according to whimsical financial and political events.

    If you have questions or are looking to set one up or need information on the “Dynamic Duo” you can find our e-book “Tax Free Income for Life” available on the website.

    Untaxingly,

    James Burns

    Share
  • “How Much is Retirement Costing You?”

    Posted on August 20th, 2008 James 1 comment

    No matter who becomes our new President it is almost assured that the entire marginal tax rate will have to shift and that means a deferred retirement plan will get hammered when you retire. Typically you put away money without tax for a number of years and then when you retire your taxed at ordinary income rates which if the tax rate shifts, means whether your successful or not successful you’re going to pay more tax on those saved dollars. The key is to reduce fees and taxes so that what you put away gets further.

    When you invest in the typical mutual fund (assuming outside of a qualified retirement plan), you face costs that erode your benefit. Chances are you’re not aware of them, they’re not in your prospectus and your broker isn’t going to sit down and tell you about them. The five costs of mutual fund investing are:

    1. Tax costs – excessive capital gains from active trading.

    2. Transaction costs – the cost of the trades themselves.

    3. Opportunity costs – dollars taken out of portfolios for a fund’s safekeeping.

    4. Sales charges – both seen and hidden.

    5. Expense ratio, or “management fees” – no end to increases in site. This is a calculation based on the operating costs of the fund divided by the average amount of assets under management.

    How radically do fund expenses affect you? Well, with the expense ratio, which averages 1.6% per year, sales charges of 0.5%, turnover generated portfolio transactions costs of 0.7% and opportunity costs of 0.3%—when funds hold cash rather than remain fully invested in stocks— the average mutual fund investor loses 3.1% of their investment returns every year just on fees. While this might not seem like much on the surface, costs and fees alone could consume 31% of a 10% market return. Think about that. You could be losing almost a third of your return before it’s even taxed. You’re losing a third of your return just for the cost of maintaining your investment. Add in the 1.5% capital gains tax bill that the average fund investor pays each year and that figure shoots up to 46% of your return being lost to fees and expenses, nearly half of a potential 10% return.

    In my new book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” we discuss tax-free strategies that reduce fees and allow you to save more that will go much further. We’ve identified two vehicles that allow for tax-free build-up and one of those is the proper use of savings grade life insurance that is described in the book. Also, I have an e-book on tax-free income for life that lays out the strategy to help you be successful.

    Untaxingly,

    James Burns, Esq.

    Share