Domestic Financial Terrorism – How do we defend?

The level of destruction on our financial system is incredible compared to what even Timothy McVee did as a domestic terrorist. You have to ask yourself who do some of these bankers and investment firms work for when you look at what they’ve done to the once wealthiest nation in the world.

Right now we’ve got $2 trillion in short-term debt that has to be refinanced this year of 2010 and China, India and Russia are not buying. This is not counting the extra deficit spending which should top $1.35 trillion this year…more or less. The fact the countries we’ve relied on are not buying means we have to fire up the printing presses again. We would already acknowledge that we are at a 10% inflation but the money folks have been using tricky phrases like “core inflation” which ignores half the things we spend money on so that way they can keep the numbers looking low.

A great book called This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly by Carmen Reinhard and Kenneth Rogoff shows that EVERY TIME a nation’s debt went above 90% of GDP or Growth Domestic Product…the nation failed. The book studies 25 countries over 800 years and there were NO exceptions to the 90% rule. Every nation that ran their deficits to this 90% ratio is now off the map or turned Third World.

Right now, the US is above 90% and there appears no way to bring it down for decades unless some obscure genius comes out of the woodwork as they are not in the White House, Treasury or Fed.

It is unclear what Americans will do, especially for their retirement as the very tool our bankers use against us (stock market) they expect us to hand over our life’s savings and just be ok with negative 30 or 40% loses. You know, its just the market reacting and it goes up and down. Why is that Ok? Why should we accept losses that take us forever to recover just to get back where we started be considered alright?

We need to redo some of the Healthcare Reform Act that President Obama so valiantly promoted before 2013 when our investments could be ravaged with a sur-tax just because we are in a certain income bracket and that bracket is not hard to be in if you live in a state with a high cost of living. Where is Sarah Palin and the Tea Party when we need them.

It is time to look at guaranteed opportunities that does not go down when the market goes down. When Wall Street was once honorable a man named Benjamin Graham (mentor to Warren Buffet) extolled what was an investment. It preserved principal and gave an adequate return. We need to get back to this simple idea and quit trying to find home runs since base hits get you to home plate just as well.

We also need tax-free strategies to weather the storm our own government and their brainy bankers have left before us. It was like turning on the gas to an already smoldering economy.

James Burns

“How to Save Your IRA from Destruction”

If you have an IRA and you’re concerned about how to pass it on to your loved ones, an approach of naming a trust as the designated beneficiary has several benefits over directly naming the beneficiaries. The issues that can affect the named beneficiary to name a few are they could be a minor, they might not be careful with money, or they may have marital or creditor issues, and could be disabled to the extent the inheritance would affect their governmental benefits. Next, if the beneficiary dies before distribution, the alternate beneficiaries may not be accurate. Another condition we often see is the beneficiary may purposely or accidentally withdraw monies from the IRA causing adverse tax consequences. Additionally naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate language that extends payout called “conduit provisions” may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.

However, in 2005, the IRS issued Private Letter Ruling 200537044 (the “PLR”) that approved a new type of revocable trust created solely to be the beneficiary of an IRA account. As a result of this PLR, it is now possible for you to create an individual trust known as an IRA Beneficiary Trust® which provides maximum protection and flexibility for your retirement investments.

This IRA Beneficiary Trust® insures that your beneficiaries will extend (“stretch-out”) their taxable Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) on the IRA over a much longer period of time. By using this trust, the age of each beneficiary becomes the effective age for that beneficiary’s required minimum distribution. As an effect, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years free of income-tax and may literally grow to be worth millions of dollars! This type of trust goes by many names and has also been called an IRA trust, an IRA Inheritance Trust, a standalone IRA trust, an IRA stretch trust or an IRA protection trust.When your loved one/s inherit your IRA fund and they keep the funds in the IRA over their lives and only take the minimum required distributions each year (the “stretch-out”), the amount of money that can accumulate and be paid to them should be massive in comparison to taking the monies directly and facing the immediate tax on them. For example, assume you have a $150,000 IRA account; we will also further assume you have two different ages (10 and 25) for your beneficiaries and presume that the account averages an annualized 7% return. First, for the beneficiary who is age 35[i] and inherits IRA proceeds upon your departure, the total benefit is $1,212,165 of after-tax benefit as opposed to $663,496 for taking the proceeds directly without the stretch-out. For the 10 year old beneficiary,[ii] they will receive approximately $4,589,236 after-tax benefit as opposed to $2,641,198 which is what they would receive lacking the stretch-out because of the immediate taxes due when they receive your funds directly.

Therefore, you can see that this wealth amassing strategy only works if the beneficiaries hold the inherited funds inside the IRA account. If a beneficiary takes all of the funds out of the IRA account (referred to as a “blow-out” because it blows the stretch-out), this wealth accumulation technique is lost. One great reason to create an IRA Beneficiary Trust® is to preserve the stretch-out and prevent a blow-out. Unfortunately, we see this blow-out too often and it jeopardizes wealth that must be saved. Many times your beneficiaries will not be aware of the tax rules and their distribution choices, so they’ll withdraw from the IRA funds at the first opportunity or do a forbidden rollover. Even if you hope that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing by keeping the funds in the IRA account for their lives to “stretch-out” payments, they may expose it to numerous threats and hope is not a planning strategy as I’ve indicated in my book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth.”

Some of the threats come in the form of a divorce where your beneficiary’s spouse could seek half of the inherited IRA if they live in a community property state. The divorce rate is out of control and a huge numbers of inherited money has become a target for the ex-spouse. Even though inherited property is considered separate property it may become the only thing available and because divorces can be very costly and last for years, your beneficiary may succumb to the pressures of long and nasty divorce litigation and be willing to surrender a large portion of the IRA account just to settle the divorce.

If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.

James Burns, principal of the Law Office of James Burns and author of the international best seller “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” shows unassuming investors how naming a trust as the designated beneficiary of their IRA has several very important advantages over directly naming the beneficiaries.

In addition, Burns says: naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate “conduit-trust” language, may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.

Burns’ office is one of few that offer the IRA Beneficiary Trust® which insures that your beneficiaries “stretch-out” their taxable, required minimum IRA distributions over a much longer period of time. And, if you do it right, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years income-tax free  and can literally grow to be worth millions of dollars!

Even if you assume that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing – that is, keep the funds in the IRA account for their lives to maximize the income tax “stretch-out” of the IRA – the IRA may still be seriously exposed to one or more of the following threats that can arise years after you depart.

If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.

The Law Office of James Burns provides debt settlement services, bankruptcies, short sales and estate and wealth planning with emphasis on real estate investing.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Tax Free Income for Life

I’ve been working on my new program which is going to be essential as Congress is likely to shift the entire marginal tax rate making your deferred plan (IRA or 401(k)) obsolete. You’ll want to take a look at our two vehicle system to build up tax-free.

One of the vehicles is the Solo-401(k) ROTH self-directed plan. This vehicles does not have income limitations on the $165,000 for a couple filing jointly the way the ROTH IRA does. It is designed for solo-practitioners, those without employees or contractors or part-time people.

Since it is ROTH you pay your taxes up front but never pay again on the build-up or when you take monies out in the future. Traditional deferred plans allow you to defer taxes but get hammered when you retire if you are in a higher tax bracket and without tax deductions to offset which is uniformly the case for a retiree.

You can contribute up to 25% of compensation and additional catch-up is available for those 50 or older. A $41,000 annual limit applies and is indexed in the future up to 2010 unless the new regime changes things when they are sworn in as President and one could be higher than the other. A cap of $205,000 on compensation  was in force as of 2004 and is indexed up to 2010. The benefit is that you can set aside more tax-free money in the solo-401(k) ROTH than other plan choices and if it is self-directed, you do have to remain victim to what the market provides as you can have numerous choices for guranteed returns that are not connected to the market at all.

Remember this is just one half of a dynamic duo that provides for tax-free income for life. You’ll want to examine the seld-directed arena so that you’re not held to just mutual funds and other market connected investments that are roller coaster driven because they are up and down according to whimsical financial and political events.

If you have questions or are looking to set one up or need information on the “Dynamic Duo” you can find our e-book “Tax Free Income for Life” available on the website.

Untaxingly,

James Burns

California’s New Foreclosure Law

As a result of the subprime loan market collapse, numerous bills were introduced this year in the California Legislature, including the recently enacted SB 1137.  Within this highly charged political environment, the California Land Title Association (CLTA), along with trustees, escrow companies, and lender groups originally opposed this legislation, which subsequently underwent a series of significant amendments before being signed by the Governor earlier this week.

SB 1137 became effective July 8th as an urgency measure.  However, requirements pertaining to the notice of default and the posting and mailing of an entirely new notice will not become operative until 60 days after the effective date.

The provisions of the new law outlined below apply to loans secured by owner occupied residential real property and made between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007.  These provisions will remain effective until January 1, 2013.  The requirements are extensive and the full act text should be consulted for details.

1. A Notice of Default (NOD) may not be filed by the trustee or lender until 30 days after contact is made in person or by telephone with a borrower to asses their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure, or until 30 days after satisfying specified due diligence requirements.
2. During the initial contact the borrower must be advised of the right to request a subsequent meeting.  If a meeting is requested then it must be scheduled within 14 days.
3. An assessment of the borrower’s financial situation and discussion of options may occur at the first contact or at the subsequent meeting, but in either case the borrower must be provided a toll-free number for HUD certified housing counseling agencies.
4. A NOD must include a declaration that the borrower has been contacted or due diligence has been used to try to contact the borrower or that the borrower has surrendered the property.  Due diligence includes having a link to information on the options to avoid foreclosure on the web site of the beneficiary or their agent.
5. If a NOD was filed prior to the effective date of the new law, without a subsequent notice of rescission, then a new declaration must be included as part of the notice of sale.  The declaration must state that the borrower either was contracted to assess their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure or that no contact occurred; in which case the efforts made to contact the borrower must be listed.
6. A NOD may be filed when a borrower has not been contacted as required by the new law if the failure to contact the borrower occurred despite the due diligence of the lender or their agent.  The actions that constitute due diligence are listed in the new law.
7. A new notice has been created by the law and must be posted and mailed at the same time a notice of sale is posted.  The notice advises residents that the property may be sold and that their right to continue to reside in the property may be affected, along with certain other information.

If you have questions please send us an e-mail or if your facing a personal crisis with your mortgage because it has spiked out of control with the interest rate or you owe more than the home is worth and will be worth for years to come we may have legal solutions for you that can put you on the track to recovery. Please download the form on this page and fax it to us available Right here.

“How Much is Retirement Costing You?”

No matter who becomes our new President it is almost assured that the entire marginal tax rate will have to shift and that means a deferred retirement plan will get hammered when you retire. Typically you put away money without tax for a number of years and then when you retire your taxed at ordinary income rates which if the tax rate shifts, means whether your successful or not successful you’re going to pay more tax on those saved dollars. The key is to reduce fees and taxes so that what you put away gets further.

When you invest in the typical mutual fund (assuming outside of a qualified retirement plan), you face costs that erode your benefit. Chances are you’re not aware of them, they’re not in your prospectus and your broker isn’t going to sit down and tell you about them. The five costs of mutual fund investing are:

1. Tax costs – excessive capital gains from active trading.

2. Transaction costs – the cost of the trades themselves.

3. Opportunity costs – dollars taken out of portfolios for a fund’s safekeeping.

4. Sales charges – both seen and hidden.

5. Expense ratio, or “management fees” – no end to increases in site. This is a calculation based on the operating costs of the fund divided by the average amount of assets under management.

How radically do fund expenses affect you? Well, with the expense ratio, which averages 1.6% per year, sales charges of 0.5%, turnover generated portfolio transactions costs of 0.7% and opportunity costs of 0.3%—when funds hold cash rather than remain fully invested in stocks— the average mutual fund investor loses 3.1% of their investment returns every year just on fees. While this might not seem like much on the surface, costs and fees alone could consume 31% of a 10% market return. Think about that. You could be losing almost a third of your return before it’s even taxed. You’re losing a third of your return just for the cost of maintaining your investment. Add in the 1.5% capital gains tax bill that the average fund investor pays each year and that figure shoots up to 46% of your return being lost to fees and expenses, nearly half of a potential 10% return.

In my new book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” we discuss tax-free strategies that reduce fees and allow you to save more that will go much further. We’ve identified two vehicles that allow for tax-free build-up and one of those is the proper use of savings grade life insurance that is described in the book. Also, I have an e-book on tax-free income for life that lays out the strategy to help you be successful.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.