-
To Dream the Impossible Dream - Beating the Stock Market
Posted on June 18th, 2010 No commentsA few years ago after reviewing some portfolios for clients that tried their hand in stock market trading it was obvious to me that they were gambling as if they were at the roulette table in Vegas. As someone who has worked for a billionaire and observed the asset class relative to stock, the investments were safe blue chip stocks, bonds, Treasuries and Index funds because it is next to impossible to beat the market. I then wrote my first book The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth that discusses the fundamentals of what is an investment and what to look for every-time you start to consider an investment. Benjamin Graham who was the mentor of Warren Buffet stated an investment was something that preserved principal and provided and adequate return.
In the book we also discuss John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard Investments, views on investing and trying to beat the market. Mr. Bogle’s academic research proved that virtually no one could consistently beat the market over long stretches (like the 35 years we have to invest for retirement). The best you could hope for was to meet the market, which gave you returns that weren’t half bad. in my book we recount the research of looking at 355 mutual funds over the 35 years and that only 3 of them did anything compelling and that was in line with what the S&P 500 did. Hence, the idea is that going forward how would the average person who works uncover those 3 funds out of the masses; you can’t is the answer.
To this end, Mr. Bogle said we need to invest in a broad swath of stocks and bonds through low-cost index funds and forget about your portfolio. Spend your time living your life instead of researching stocks and bonds. That’s much more fun than sweating over investments anyway. If you’re going to research anything it would be real estate and starting your own business as other assets.
The other pundit of the idea that almost no one beats the market is Terrance Odean, a Berkeley professor who proved Bogle’s theory from another perspective. The more you trade, the more you lose, Odean discovered by examining the real-life portfolios and trading patterns of thousands of investors. His paper, Boys Will Be Boys, is a must-read for anyone who is trying to retire in comfort and not run out of money and for those who think they’re going to outsmart the stock market. You know the guys who have a super large screen in their office and they seem to be following the market and making trades. What they are really doing is creating taxes with capital gains and many of them short term which costs more, all for what?
Steady and consistent gets to the finish line if we remember what Aesop tried to teach us in the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. The best way to invest with success is to get base hits and not try to get a home run all the time. If we look at baseball, a home run is great but really you accomplish more if you get a base hit and move it one base at a time to home plate; this is better than striking out.
James Burns, Esq.
News, Succession planning, asset protection, business, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, real estate, retirement AARP, annuities, annuity, BP, British Petroleum, CD, certificate of deposit, commodities, futures, guranteed income contract, Health Care, individual retirement acccount, investing, IRA, life insurance, Medicaid, pension, retirement, savings account, social security, stock market, stocks, trading -
Survival of the Smartest in Retirement
Posted on June 17th, 2010 No commentsAn estimated 47 percent of Americans born between 1948 and 1954 may not be able to afford basic expenses and uninsured health-care costs through retirement, according to the Washington-based Employee Benefit Research Institute. EBRI has a database of 24 million 401(k) participants and 20 million Individual Retirement Accounts.
“The risk of outliving one’s assets in retirement, or longevity risk, has been placed squarely on the shoulders of workers,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi said in testimony for the hearing. The life expectancy of a 65-year- old U.S. male is 82, and 85 for a 65-year-old female, according to the Social Security Administration.
There are solutions for guaranteed income contracts for life which makes sense to add to your planning. This provides predictability on outcome rather than riding the roller coaster of the market.
James Burns, Esq.
-
Health (scare) Care Reform and an Insidious Tax it Releases
Posted on May 11th, 2010 No commentsThe new Health care reform bill includes a 3.8 percent Medicare tax on unearned income including annuities, and possibly income recognized from the surrender or sale of life insurance.
Many clients have asked how to get out of annuities they don’t need to minimize a potential huge tax hit. This is only if you don’t think you’ll need this income as we can move it to an insurance policy that is free of the tax, leaves a legacy and still provide some income for you and your family.
This strategy spreads out potential tax payments over a 7-year period and moves funds from an existing annuity where funds are trapped and destined for taxes to efficiently transfer your wealth through life Insurance.The benefit to you is that you keep more of what you earned and leave more to your family who should be the recipients of all your hard work.
Don’t fail to plan or get information on how this might affect you as the outcome could be disastrous.
James Burns
News, Succession planning, asset protection, business, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, retirement annuities, annuity, asset protection, California, finance, financial planning, Health Care, Health Care Reform Bill, IRA, life insurance, Medicaid, MediCal, Medicare, Orange County, pension, retirement, tax, tax planning -
Estate Planning and New Estate Tax Laws
Posted on October 12th, 2009 1 commentThere are three estate tax bills on the table and each one makes you feel like why bother trying to get wealthy if they are going to take it away when I die.
First there is S.722 which is introduced by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., Chairman of the Senate Finance Committe which proposes a freeze on the estate tax exclusion rate at 2009 ($3.5 million per person). S.722 also provides for reunification of the estate and gift tax credit (use $3.5 towards estate or gift tax) and is indexed for inflation.
Also in the House is H.R. 2032, sponsored by Rep. McDermott, D-Wash., who would like to make the estate tax exemption permanent at $2million per person ($4mil for husband and wife) and index for inflation with progressive estate tax rates of 45% for estates valued between $2 million and $5 million; 50% for estates at $5 million to $10 million; and 55% for estates valued over $10 million…makes you want to go out right now and make over $10 million so you can give 55% back to a government that can’t balance its budget and just put a couple trillion worth of bailout money on the equivalent of a credit card.
Finally, there is Bill H. R. 436 which is introduced by yet another Democrat Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. and it would freeze the exclusion at 2009 level (same as above) and reunify the estate and gift tax. However, this nasty pernicious Bill would wack out the opportunities found with Family Limited Parnterships (FLIPs) which is valuation discounts so you can remove highly appreciated assets out of your estate.
You need to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind before they rule on some of the most anti-wealth legislation in recent years punishing those who do well and want to leave a legacy for their family or charity.
In order to protect your assets there is a new form of asset protection which is protection against adverse legislation. Every American’s retirement hangs in the balance especially if you have a large IRA that would run afoul of these potential laws.
Untaxingly,
James Burns, Esq.
News, asset protection, business, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, retirement asset protection, Bill H. R. 436, estate planning, estate tax, family limited partners, FLIPs, gift tax, H.R. 2032, IRA, Rep. Earl Pomeroy D-N.D., Rep. McDermott D-Wash., retirement, S.722, Sen. Max Baucus D-Mont. -
“THREE WAYS YOU CAN AVOID GOING BROKE IN THE NEW ECONOMY”
Posted on September 3rd, 2009 No commentsThe first thing you can do as illustrated in “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” book is take ownership of your monthly expenditures by having a family budget and a family balance sheet you observe with conviction. If you’re desirous of change, you have to do the work since the only place success comes before work is the dictionary.
Number two, if your home payments are too high because you’re job or industry has fallen off, seek a loan workout with your lender or use a law firm to assist you that has a success rate.
Mr. Burns also states that if you are carrying too much bad debt like credit cards and you’re slowing sinking into the quicksand, think about debt settlement or management services that don’t have an upfront cost and can get you from point A to point B in terms of eliminating this debt. While it may have a temporary blemish on your credit score, at least you get back to the surface where you can breathe.
Lastly, if you’re crunched for cash to invest or pay down bills, look if you or your parents have an old universal life or convertible term life insurance policy that has underperformed or is not really needed and consider having it sold in the secondary market as a life settlement.
More power solutions are available right here so stay tuned, get involved and please send in comments so we can save or pick up lives in this down economy. In numbers we are strong.
James Burns, Esq.
-
Tax Free Retirement Cash Flow
Posted on August 10th, 2009 2 commentsOverfunding is a strategy that focuses on accumulating cash in the policy rather than paying for the death benefit which is the payout to your loved one’s when you pass away. This approach leverages the highest policy premium that is allowed with the lowest life insurance death benefit so that your cash accumulation exceeds your policy net insurance costs over at least 10 years. There are fundamentally 4 steps to determining the combination of maximum premiums and minimum death benefits necessary to selecting the most leveraged indexed universal life policy:
1.
First, determine the person’s maximum premium commitment over a minimum of ten years or more. The premium amount selected should be an amount that they can make regularly whether it is a monthly or annual payment and does not strap their cash flow. Universal life insurance policies offer flexible premium payments, but to get the maximum leverage you have to stay on course with a premium payment.
2.
Secondly, determine the minimum insurance face amount and payment commitment along with your age and gender to make sure the numbers work based on your particulars. Most insurance illustration provide the actual premium amount limits that meet the internal revenue code minimum requirements.
3.
Next, go over the internal rate of return (IRR) of the policy to ensure you’ll be getting the full benefit of the tax-free accumulation versus what an ordinary investment would receive outside of this tax-free environment. Some agent’s illustrate way too high like 8% which is unrealistic. We usually do ours at 5.25% and still kick the pants off other investments.
4. Finally, you must pay close attention to the maximum premiums allowable under the Internal Revenue Code which is referred to as the seven-pay premium limitation.[1] As long as the total premiums for any seven-year period are equal to or less than the maximum allowable premiums for the seven-pay test,[2] you’ll be able to access the cash values in the policy at any time, tax-free and relatively liquid.
In essence, a life insurance contract that fails to meet the seven-pay test will be classified as a modified endowment contract (MEC). The seven-pay test is not met if the accumulated amount paid at any time during the first seven years is more than the total of the net level premiums that would normally have been paid on or before such time if the contract provided for paid-up future benefits after payment of seven level annual premiums
Want to see if this is a fit for you? If you’re healthy it may very well be a great tool in your arsenal to slay the bailout dragon for your retirement.
-
“Buying Foreclosure Without the Exposure”
Posted on January 12th, 2009 No commentsStart your retirement planning early
Real estate investing is exciting because we get the opportunity to use wealth pillars like leverage which allows ordinary people the ability to considerable wealth in a short time; I know because I’ve seen it happen. Another exciting aspect is there are always opportunities to make strong returns, regardless of how the market is doing and right now that is especially true as we bear witness to hundreds of thousands of foreclosure nationally per month. But like other forms of investments, real estate investing takes discipline, education and smart decision making to become successful. I’ve met with clients who made impulse purchases and the result is usually disaster.
There are fundamentally at least eleven reasons why real estate deals are always available no matter what the real estate market is doing. There is no magic here, just human circumstances that create opportunity if you know how to look for them.
1. Divorce
2. Job loss
3. Job relocation
4. Bankruptcy
5. Health problems
6. Incarceration
7. Reduced income – market conditions
8. Death
9. Failed business
10. Military duty or activation
11. Adjustable rate mortgages – on stated income that was unrealRight now all eleven of these personal circumstances are widespread since American is in two military conflicts, unemployment expands monthly, record business failures and layoffs and numerous professional incomes reduced due to market conditions. In my own practice of modifying loans I see that there was a serious abuse of the stated income loan that has now come to boil and are popping left and right leaving folks unable to make the payments. The inability to make adjusted payments should be no surprise as there was no way for them to ever afford the home with their current income.
Enter the REO. An REO (real-estate-owned) is a form of distressed property and is similar to buying a short sale (sale of a home for less than the owner owed), except the property is already back in the possession of the lender or bank through the foreclosure process. In an REO situation the banks end up owning the property when no one bids to cover the amount owed against the property at a public auction. REO homes are often considered the best way to buy a distressed property because the seller is already out of the picture. It’s just the investor or their agent, the bank or the bank’s agent negotiating the transaction. Some REOs can be purchased directly from the lender for pennies on the dollar especially for those who can buy them in bulk. However, if you combine the purchase of an REO with a system for investing where you don’t have to do anything but collect your checks then you can leverage your time and resources to make and find more opportunities.
Normally REOs are purchased on what is referred to as tapes and the more money you have to spend the better the tape but on these large tapes there are the good, the bad and the ugly which are properties that you wouldn’t want because the fix up costs eat into the profits. Also, to get really good deals or the actual pennies on the dollar you have to come in with millions if not billions the way the hedge funds do who typically have purchased most of the good deals by the time the individual investors or small investor pools can get a hold of the REOs. Nevertheless, there is an old fashion way of acquiring these properties if you have the time to fly all over to numerous states and get into the underground or you can rely on a systematized approach to investing in this distressed market where you’re able to not only get all good properties (bedroom communities), the system operators actually cherry pick and buy properties that are livable, fix them up bring you not only positive monthly cash flow from your systematized property but also has built-in exit strategies that put a cash windfall on top of your positive cash flow.
All the most successful business in America follows a system. Once you have real estate you are in business in a sense, you’ve become a real estate entrepreneur and why wouldn’t you want a system to take care of your investing? To make sure we understand what a system is specifically here is a great definition: System (from Latin systma, in turn from Greek systma) is a set of interacting or interdependent relationships, real or abstract, forming an integrated whole. The concept of an ‘integrated whole’ can also be stated in terms of a system embodying a set of relationships which are differentiated from relationships of the set to other elements, and from relationships between an element of the set and elements not a part of the relational regime.[i] Now this is just a very technical way of saying things that work together or “special sauce” if we were to look at Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC™).
The system works like this, you buy the property, management places a new buyer in the home that will pay you the going rate for rent is in the area as their new mortgage payment to you, and you’ve just become the bank. For example, say rents at the local apartment are $500 and you only make $1,000 to $1,500 net after taxes. If I came up to you and said hey, “how would you like to own a home for $500 down and $500 per month,” the same you’re paying right now in rent, what would the reasonable person do? They are going to want to own and you have them on a land contract, no landlord/tenant relationship here so you don’t fix sinks, toilets or anything else…it is their home. You just hold this contract like the bank and are akin to the note which is reverse engineered at $500 at 10% time 10 years amortized. Did you get a deal? Of course you did and until this person repairs their credit so did they because we made it affordable just like a car dealer would…it’s all about the payment.
Management collects your $500 per month minus a 10% servicing fee for collecting and disbursing your money and making a website available to you on line where you can manage your property and check on it and see pictures both interior and exterior.
The lynchpin in this type of investing is the land contract. A land contract (sometimes known as a “contract for deed” or an “installment sale agreement”) is an agreement between the owner of a property and a person who wants to buy the property for an agreed-upon purchase price.
What are the Benefits of using the land contract you might ask? Well, there are plenty but they include, not having to fix anything, you don’t pay taxes or insurance, payments are predetermined and there are minimal liabilities (asset protection).
Finally, for the first time you have multiple exit-strategies inherent in your real property investment. I usually ask real estate investors that come in to my office two questions - #1 what is the exit strategy? And #2 did you buy retail, wholesale or discount? In both cases they give me a look like I spoke a foreign language at them. In this system these two threshold concerns are integrated because you have the exit strategies and you are definitely buying discount.
You or your new buyer could choose to refinance as it behooves them to get conventional financing which may be lower than structured in your land contract. For example, if you had an investment entry point of $23,900 and a $37,900 sales price fixed in your land contract. After a year of timely and seasoned payments the land contract Buyer’s credit is restored. Buyer can refinance property to lower interest rate and cashes out your $37,900 note which creates a high return on investment (ROI).
Alternatively, since you own this note you might choose to sell it to a note buyer. For example if you have an investment of $29,900 which you sold for $90,000 ($500 down@ $500 per month @ 12% interest) and after the loan seasons for 12 to 18 months you have the option of selling your note in a marketplace that is a trillion dollar industry. So you sell your note for $67,500 (25% discount). But you’ve also received the $5,400 in monthly income for the past year. The combined profit is in Excess of $40,000 or more with the monthly payments and the note sale even though it is discounted. That’s another hard to find ROI particularly if you’re accustomed to market returns from mutual funds and the like.
You can always just hold because you have an investment of $29,900 with a documented sales price of $60,000 via the land contract.
This system has been a huge success with waiting lists of approved applicants nationwide just waiting for properties to come available as the secondary buyers. We are watching this program transform families, neighborhoods and communities. In addition to the socially redeeming value of this program, it provides investors with massive advantages. Some of those include:
1. Triple Net - Your buyer is responsible for taxes, insurance and maintenance
2. Pride of ownership - Your buyer typically improves home and maintains well
3. Lower Default - Owners paying the same amount as they would for rent rarely default
4. Socially redeeming - You can help a hard working family become home owners
5. Cash flow between $450 - $650 - for properties purchased all under $30,000.
The next five to ten years will be defining and you have the power to change your financial future if you only get off the sidelines and in the game. I played football in college and whether you were at a real game or a practice scrimmage, while you were on the bench at the sidelines you were helpless to change the outcome of the game. It was only when you got in the game and you knew you placed your entire being into the game that you hand control to change an outcome and in effect, you can only take control of your own personal destiny by getting in the game.
To prove the point that you can be more victorious in a down market you’ll want to take a lesson from the playbook of Floyd Bostwick Odlum. He has been described as “possibly the only man in the United States who made a great fortune out of the Depression.”
After struggling as a corporate attorney in Salt Lake City, Odlum received an offer to a law clerk at a New York firm, and in 1921 became Vice-President of his primary client, Electric Bond and Share Corporation.
About 1923, Floyd Odlum and friends along with their wives pooled together a total of $39,600 and formed the United States Company to speculate in purchases of utilities and general securities. Within two years, the company’s net assets had increased 17 fold to nearly $700,000. If Mr. Odlum got started with $39,600 during the Great Depression, can’t you get a few friends or family together and pool funds to get in on this once in a lifetime historical opportunity to purchase discounted REOs at a modern price-point of $29,900? We only see great declines once or twice in our lifetimes and who can predict the next one as this one came without warning; will you have done something by then?
“Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.” — Thomas Edison, Inventor
Success Driver,
James Burns, Esq.
(949) 440-3243
News, business, finance, mortgage, real estate, retirement Add new tag, bailout, finance, foreclosure, investment, IRA, James G. Burns, James G. Burns Esq., land contract, making money, modification, money, Orange County short sale, real estate, real estate investing, real estate riches, REO, Stone Equity Group, system, The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth, wealth, Wealth Building, www.jamesburnslaw.com -
“How to Save Your IRA from Destruction”
Posted on January 1st, 2009 No commentsIf you have an IRA and you’re concerned about how to pass it on to your loved ones, an approach of naming a trust as the designated beneficiary has several benefits over directly naming the beneficiaries. The issues that can affect the named beneficiary to name a few are they could be a minor, they might not be careful with money, or they may have marital or creditor issues, and could be disabled to the extent the inheritance would affect their governmental benefits. Next, if the beneficiary dies before distribution, the alternate beneficiaries may not be accurate. Another condition we often see is the beneficiary may purposely or accidentally withdraw monies from the IRA causing adverse tax consequences. Additionally naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate language that extends payout called “conduit provisions” may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.
However, in 2005, the IRS issued Private Letter Ruling 200537044 (the “PLR”) that approved a new type of revocable trust created solely to be the beneficiary of an IRA account. As a result of this PLR, it is now possible for you to create an individual trust known as an IRA Beneficiary Trust® which provides maximum protection and flexibility for your retirement investments.
This IRA Beneficiary Trust® insures that your beneficiaries will extend (“stretch-out”) their taxable Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) on the IRA over a much longer period of time. By using this trust, the age of each beneficiary becomes the effective age for that beneficiary’s required minimum distribution. As an effect, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years free of income-tax and may literally grow to be worth millions of dollars! This type of trust goes by many names and has also been called an IRA trust, an IRA Inheritance Trust, a standalone IRA trust, an IRA stretch trust or an IRA protection trust.When your loved one/s inherit your IRA fund and they keep the funds in the IRA over their lives and only take the minimum required distributions each year (the “stretch-out”), the amount of money that can accumulate and be paid to them should be massive in comparison to taking the monies directly and facing the immediate tax on them. For example, assume you have a $150,000 IRA account; we will also further assume you have two different ages (10 and 25) for your beneficiaries and presume that the account averages an annualized 7% return. First, for the beneficiary who is age 35[i] and inherits IRA proceeds upon your departure, the total benefit is $1,212,165 of after-tax benefit as opposed to $663,496 for taking the proceeds directly without the stretch-out. For the 10 year old beneficiary,[ii] they will receive approximately $4,589,236 after-tax benefit as opposed to $2,641,198 which is what they would receive lacking the stretch-out because of the immediate taxes due when they receive your funds directly.
Therefore, you can see that this wealth amassing strategy only works if the beneficiaries hold the inherited funds inside the IRA account. If a beneficiary takes all of the funds out of the IRA account (referred to as a “blow-out” because it blows the stretch-out), this wealth accumulation technique is lost. One great reason to create an IRA Beneficiary Trust® is to preserve the stretch-out and prevent a blow-out. Unfortunately, we see this blow-out too often and it jeopardizes wealth that must be saved. Many times your beneficiaries will not be aware of the tax rules and their distribution choices, so they’ll withdraw from the IRA funds at the first opportunity or do a forbidden rollover. Even if you hope that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing by keeping the funds in the IRA account for their lives to “stretch-out” payments, they may expose it to numerous threats and hope is not a planning strategy as I’ve indicated in my book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth.”
Some of the threats come in the form of a divorce where your beneficiary’s spouse could seek half of the inherited IRA if they live in a community property state. The divorce rate is out of control and a huge numbers of inherited money has become a target for the ex-spouse. Even though inherited property is considered separate property it may become the only thing available and because divorces can be very costly and last for years, your beneficiary may succumb to the pressures of long and nasty divorce litigation and be willing to surrender a large portion of the IRA account just to settle the divorce.
If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.
Untaxingly,
James Burns, Esq.
[i] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA. Your tax bracket is 35%, 25 year olds bracket is 28% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less depending on the market and asset class as one could use self-directed and have non-market assets.
[ii] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA, your tax bracket is 35%, 10 year olds bracket is 10% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less as indicated above.
News, business, finance, real estate, retirement 401(k), 401(k) rollover, 403(b), bank account, Charles Schwab, Chase, finance, individual retirement account, IRA, IRA inheritance trust, IRA protection trust, IRA stretch trust, IRA trust, Morgan Stanley, mutual funds, pension, pension plan, retirement, retirement account, retirement communities, ROTH IRA, savings, standalone IRA trust -
Medicare Scare
Posted on October 17th, 2008 1 commentSometimes seniors are denied claims and they think there is nothing they can do and they just accept it. However, a denied or partially paid claim can be appealed and nearly half of the appeals are successful and worth the effort…might as well give it a try.
When a Medicare claim is denied or approved for less that full amount, you have 120 days to request a “redetermination” of the decision. The proper form to request is called Medicare Redetermination Request Form (Form CMS-20027) which can be downloaded at (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms20027.pdf) or you can call (800) 633-4227.
The written claim denial that you receive includes instructions on where and how to submit the redetermination form. The claim denial should include an explanation why your claim was denied or only offered partial payment. You need to object the explanation in order to be successful with the appeal. You can ask your doctor to write a letter responding to the points raised in teh denial and explain why your health care is necessary. You include a copy of this letter along with the appeals form and as always, keep a copy for your files.
Common Reasons for Denial
The treatment or prescription is unlikely to cause your health condition to improve is the biggest denial circumstance and is a little vague. Medicare is required to look at your total condition, not just a specific diagnosis or your chance at a full recovery.
There was a citizen who was denied for Lou Gehrig’s disease which is incurable and degenerative. The patient successfully appealed, arguing that with the doctor’s help, that while having a nurse visit the home would not improve the condition, it could slow the progression of the disease and was need to care for various health issues.
Sometimes patients are denied because they may require long term care. You need to point out that Medicare is not limited to treatments that work quickly. As long as your doctor continues to order this treatment for you, Medicare should continue to cover it. Include a letter from your doctor if denied for this circumstance explaining that the treatment is having some positive effect or expressing an optimistic expectation that it will.
There are several other types of denial and you want to be specific to address the denial and use your primary care physician with a letter expressing an opinion that is different that Medicare’s conclusion.
Don’t give up
Sometimes you may have to go to Appeal #2 where you’ll have 180 days from the date your redetermination request is denied. You must completed Medicare Reconsideration Request Form (Form CMS-20033, at www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms20033.pdf). You may have to ask your doctor to write a new letter or attach the old letter. Sometimes it is about hanging in there and being determined.
You may have to take it to Appeal #3 if your second appeal is denied and the amount in dispute is over $120. You have 60 days to file a third appeal, this time with an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the US Dept of Health and Human Services. The filing instructions would be included with the denial letter.
Appeal #4 If the judge turns you down you have 60 days to request that Medicare Appeals Council (MAC) review the decision. The ALJ denial will include instructions on how to file.
Appeal #5 If the MAC turns you down you have 60 days to determine if you wish to hire an attorney and file a judicial review in federal district court. The amount in dispute must be greater than $1,180 to qualify.
I hope this helps a few Seniors and empowers them to fight their fight for benefits.
James Burns, Esq.
www.jamesgburns.com
(949) 440-3243
-
Tax Free Income for Life
Posted on September 14th, 2008 No commentsI’ve been working on my new program which is going to be essential as Congress is likely to shift the entire marginal tax rate making your deferred plan (IRA or 401(k)) obsolete. You’ll want to take a look at our two vehicle system to build up tax-free.
One of the vehicles is the Solo-401(k) ROTH self-directed plan. This vehicles does not have income limitations on the $165,000 for a couple filing jointly the way the ROTH IRA does. It is designed for solo-practitioners, those without employees or contractors or part-time people.
Since it is ROTH you pay your taxes up front but never pay again on the build-up or when you take monies out in the future. Traditional deferred plans allow you to defer taxes but get hammered when you retire if you are in a higher tax bracket and without tax deductions to offset which is uniformly the case for a retiree.
You can contribute up to 25% of compensation and additional catch-up is available for those 50 or older. A $41,000 annual limit applies and is indexed in the future up to 2010 unless the new regime changes things when they are sworn in as President and one could be higher than the other. A cap of $205,000 on compensation was in force as of 2004 and is indexed up to 2010. The benefit is that you can set aside more tax-free money in the solo-401(k) ROTH than other plan choices and if it is self-directed, you do have to remain victim to what the market provides as you can have numerous choices for guranteed returns that are not connected to the market at all.
Remember this is just one half of a dynamic duo that provides for tax-free income for life. You’ll want to examine the seld-directed arena so that you’re not held to just mutual funds and other market connected investments that are roller coaster driven because they are up and down according to whimsical financial and political events.
If you have questions or are looking to set one up or need information on the “Dynamic Duo” you can find our e-book “Tax Free Income for Life” available on the website.
Untaxingly,
James Burns

