To Dream the Impossible Dream – Beating the Stock Market

A few years ago after reviewing some portfolios for clients that tried their hand in stock market trading it was obvious to me that they were gambling as if they were at the roulette table in Vegas. As someone who has worked for a billionaire and observed the asset class relative to stock, the investments were safe blue chip stocks, bonds, Treasuries and Index funds because it is next to impossible to beat the market.  I then wrote my first book The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth that discusses the fundamentals of what is an investment and what to look for every-time you start to consider an investment.  Benjamin Graham who was the mentor of Warren Buffet stated an investment was something that preserved principal and provided and adequate return.

In the book we also discuss John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard Investments, views on investing and trying to beat the market. Mr. Bogle’s academic research proved that virtually no one could consistently beat the market over long stretches (like the 35 years we have to invest for retirement). The best you could hope for was to meet the market, which gave you returns that weren’t half bad. in my book we recount the research of looking at 355 mutual funds over the 35 years and that only 3 of them did anything compelling and that was in line with what the S&P 500 did. Hence, the idea is that going forward how would the average person who works uncover those 3 funds out of the masses; you can’t is the answer.

To this end, Mr. Bogle said we need to invest in a broad swath of stocks and bonds through low-cost index funds and forget about your portfolio. Spend your time living your life instead of researching stocks and bonds. That’s much more fun than sweating over investments anyway. If you’re going to research anything it would be real estate and starting your own business as other assets.

The other pundit of the idea that almost no one beats the market is Terrance Odean, a Berkeley professor who proved Bogle’s theory from another perspective. The more you trade, the more you lose, Odean discovered by examining the real-life portfolios and trading patterns of thousands of investors. His paper, Boys Will Be Boys, is a must-read for anyone who is trying to retire in comfort and not run out of money and for those who think they’re going to outsmart the stock market. You know the guys who have a super large screen in their office and they seem to be following the market and making trades. What they are really doing is creating taxes with capital gains and many of them short term which costs more, all for what?

Steady and consistent gets to the finish line if we remember what Aesop tried to teach us in the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. The best way to invest with success is to get base hits and not try to get a home run all the time. If we look at baseball, a home run is great but really you accomplish more if you get a base hit and move it one base at a time to home plate; this is better than striking out.

James Burns, Esq.

Survival of the Smartest in Retirement

An estimated 47 percent of Americans born between 1948 and 1954 may not be able to afford basic expenses and uninsured health-care costs through retirement, according to the Washington-based Employee Benefit Research Institute. EBRI has a database of 24 million 401(k) participants and 20 million Individual Retirement Accounts.

“The risk of outliving one’s assets in retirement, or longevity risk, has been placed squarely on the shoulders of workers,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi said in testimony for the hearing. The life expectancy of a 65-year- old U.S. male is 82, and 85 for a 65-year-old female, according to the Social Security Administration.

There are solutions for guaranteed income contracts for life which makes sense to add to your planning. This provides predictability on outcome rather than riding the roller coaster of the market.

James Burns, Esq.

Asset Protection Concerns for Hedge Fund Managers

We are currently in an economy where people are running scared and are uncertain. I also think there is a jaded perception where we never give thanks or gratitude for what we have and our fear and panic is all about loss of greed which is not useful. This type of environment leads people to always be dissatisfied with services and investments and many will go to the 12 person lotto (jury) via a lawsuit before you know it.

If anyone thinks I’m speculating just go to the web link at the end to review some of the ridiculous lawsuits and you’ll know we have become a country of whiners who expect to get paid from someone else based on our mistakes. Every month I go here because unlike much of the legal profession I’m for reducing lawsuit abuse Faces of Lawsuit Abuse.

Since my legal work is more about wealth creation or transfer than wealth deletion, we speak with many of the top financial firms and hedge fund managers. I have found in speaking to these financial professionals that many are concerned with being a victim to either a baseless lawsuit or one that could have been settled between the individuals. In times like this you can never satisfy investors when the market goes down or the investment does not work out as expected. It is difficult to perform your profession while a huge black cloud hangs overhead or you try to sleep after an investment tanks and you know the clients will be calling and accusing you of their financial demise as if you personally made the investment go down.

This is when a high quality and legitimate asset protection plan should be integrated into your overall risk management and personal estate/succession plan. All financial planners who advise clients on risk management owe it to their clients to do what they say and be a product of the product by having a proper estate and asset protection plan.

For clarification, asset protection is the use of risk management tools and legal strategies to preserve a person’s wealth so that it is not unfairly confiscated from them in a court proceeding. Because of the litigation lottery where predators go to the 12 person lotto (jury) and other fear and societal norms of solving problems with large pay days in court we see a rise in the abuse of the system and whether you win or not you’re a loser because you’ve had to pay to defend yourself at a cost of time, money and personal unrest.

A recent study of hedge fund professionals revealed that 39.8 percent had been involved in unjust lawsuits or divorce proceedings and 83.3 percent of hedge fund managers had a concern of their own personal wealth derailment through court proceedings. It should be said that it would be very difficult to get a jury of 12 people in this economy that would feel anything but contempt for a hedge fund manager or other wealthy person since they appear filthy rich and easily able to absorb the damages they caused to the poor person who is less fortunate. The case would ready like the quintessential “David meets Goliath” in the eyes of the jury since they are usually comprised of the folks who either don’t work or hate work so they are getting paid to be there by their company through a trial.

The cost of being caught with your pants down can be more than embarrassment and in some instances can wipe 0ut all of the hard work that went into building a business of a family legacy. It most attacks against you it might comes as a Pearl Harbor sneak attack or it might be something you knew was coming but failed to realize the gravity and that someone who thinks you’ve wronged them wants to be vindicated in dollars.

All this can be avoided and what we do every day is help folks incorporate proper tax and risk management strategies into their business, estate and retirement planning because you often do not get a second chance and by the time the complaint is served, it is too late to consider your options to save what you’ve worked for. I have had many professionals with practices they build up over a 20 year period see the light that it all could be lost if this person was to strike a chord with a group of 12 and take away everything.

I leave you with this thought – Q: If you have assets when might a good time to protect them be? A: Right now is the winning answer.

James Burns, Esq.

The Asset Protection Guy

Medicare Scare

Sometimes seniors are denied claims and they think there is nothing they can do and they just accept it. However, a denied or partially paid claim can be appealed and nearly half of the appeals are successful and worth the effort…might as well give it a try.

When a Medicare claim is denied or approved for less that full amount, you have 120 days to request a “redetermination” of the decision. The proper form to request is called Medicare Redetermination Request Form (Form CMS-20027) which can be downloaded at (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms20027.pdf) or you can call (800) 633-4227.

The written claim denial that you receive includes instructions on where and how to submit the redetermination form. The claim denial should include an explanation why your claim was denied or only offered partial payment. You need to object the explanation in order to be successful with the appeal. You can ask your doctor to write a letter responding to the points raised in teh denial and explain why your health care is necessary. You include a copy of this letter along with the appeals form and as always, keep a copy for your files.

Common Reasons for Denial

The treatment or prescription is unlikely to cause your health condition to improve is the biggest denial circumstance and is a little vague. Medicare is required to look at your total condition, not just a specific diagnosis or your chance at a full recovery.

There was a citizen who was denied for Lou Gehrig’s disease which is incurable and degenerative. The patient successfully appealed, arguing that with the doctor’s help, that while having a nurse visit the home would not improve the condition, it could slow the progression of the disease and was need to care for various health issues.

Sometimes patients are denied because they may require long term care. You need to point out that Medicare is not limited to treatments that work quickly. As long as your doctor continues to order this treatment for you, Medicare should continue to cover it. Include a letter from your doctor if denied for this circumstance explaining that the treatment is having some positive effect or expressing an optimistic expectation that it will.

There are several other types of denial and you want to be specific to address the denial and use your primary care physician with a letter expressing an opinion that is different that Medicare’s conclusion.

Don’t give up

Sometimes you may have to go to Appeal #2 where you’ll have 180 days from the date your redetermination request is denied. You must completed Medicare Reconsideration Request Form (Form CMS-20033, at www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms20033.pdf). You may have to ask your doctor to write a new letter or attach the old letter. Sometimes it is about hanging in there and being determined.

You may have to take it to Appeal #3 if your second appeal is denied and the amount in dispute is over $120. You have 60 days to file a third appeal, this time with an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the US Dept of Health and Human Services. The filing instructions would be included with the denial letter.

Appeal #4  If the judge turns you down you have 60 days to request that Medicare Appeals Council (MAC) review the decision. The ALJ denial will include instructions on how to file.

Appeal #5 If the MAC turns you down you have 60 days to determine if you wish to hire an attorney and file a judicial review in federal district court. The amount in dispute must be greater than $1,180 to qualify.

I hope this helps a few Seniors and empowers them to fight their fight for benefits.

James Burns, Esq.

www.jamesgburns.com

(949) 440-3243

California’s New Foreclosure Law

As a result of the subprime loan market collapse, numerous bills were introduced this year in the California Legislature, including the recently enacted SB 1137.  Within this highly charged political environment, the California Land Title Association (CLTA), along with trustees, escrow companies, and lender groups originally opposed this legislation, which subsequently underwent a series of significant amendments before being signed by the Governor earlier this week.

SB 1137 became effective July 8th as an urgency measure.  However, requirements pertaining to the notice of default and the posting and mailing of an entirely new notice will not become operative until 60 days after the effective date.

The provisions of the new law outlined below apply to loans secured by owner occupied residential real property and made between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007.  These provisions will remain effective until January 1, 2013.  The requirements are extensive and the full act text should be consulted for details.

1. A Notice of Default (NOD) may not be filed by the trustee or lender until 30 days after contact is made in person or by telephone with a borrower to asses their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure, or until 30 days after satisfying specified due diligence requirements.
2. During the initial contact the borrower must be advised of the right to request a subsequent meeting.  If a meeting is requested then it must be scheduled within 14 days.
3. An assessment of the borrower’s financial situation and discussion of options may occur at the first contact or at the subsequent meeting, but in either case the borrower must be provided a toll-free number for HUD certified housing counseling agencies.
4. A NOD must include a declaration that the borrower has been contacted or due diligence has been used to try to contact the borrower or that the borrower has surrendered the property.  Due diligence includes having a link to information on the options to avoid foreclosure on the web site of the beneficiary or their agent.
5. If a NOD was filed prior to the effective date of the new law, without a subsequent notice of rescission, then a new declaration must be included as part of the notice of sale.  The declaration must state that the borrower either was contracted to assess their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure or that no contact occurred; in which case the efforts made to contact the borrower must be listed.
6. A NOD may be filed when a borrower has not been contacted as required by the new law if the failure to contact the borrower occurred despite the due diligence of the lender or their agent.  The actions that constitute due diligence are listed in the new law.
7. A new notice has been created by the law and must be posted and mailed at the same time a notice of sale is posted.  The notice advises residents that the property may be sold and that their right to continue to reside in the property may be affected, along with certain other information.

If you have questions please send us an e-mail or if your facing a personal crisis with your mortgage because it has spiked out of control with the interest rate or you owe more than the home is worth and will be worth for years to come we may have legal solutions for you that can put you on the track to recovery. Please download the form on this page and fax it to us available Right here.

TAX REDUCTION AND ASSET PROTECTION FOR REAL PROPERTY

The most intimidating concern of real estate investors is how do I protect my property, reduce taxes and what entity if any should I use? First, you must have a very good tax and legal team who understands real estate and investors.

If you are an investor who does rehabs, fixer uppers, option contracts, developments, consulting and services or you are a real estate agent or broker you are facing self-employment tax which is upsetting. The rate is 15.3% which is the difference of the 7.65% that an employer withholds for social security and Medicare and then matches. As a self-employed individual, you receive no match and pay the entire 15.3%.

If you’re paying elevated self-employment tax, you are a sole proprietor. Often a client can optimize their situation by using an entity but which one will do the trick? By now you’ve probably been racking your brains on this very question and heard of the C-corp., S-corp., Limited Liability Company (LLC), and Family Limited Partnership (FLP). The C-corporation is sometimes effective by typically not a good fit for most because it creates a double taxation. The S-corp is generally best for a company raising capital or going public. However, sometimes a C Corporation may be appropriate for other operations because its initial tax brackets of 15% and 25%.  For example, if you’re in an individual tax bracket of 25% or higher, then there could be an opportunity to eliminate taxes by shifting some of your income to a C Corporation. This has a nice application because of the shifting of income to a taxpayer (your C Corporation for instance) in a lower tax bracket than you personally.

The S-corporation makes great sense for those who are doing consulting, rehabbing, fix & flips, developments and services because it is a flow through entity. Because of this flow-through capability there is no capital gains tax and no dividend tax but you have to take a “reasonable salary” and create a payroll which is probably the biggest intricacy. There are no hard and fast rules on the salary and is a subjective analysis. My team and I have devised a spit that is prudent, yet reduces tax. This salary/dividend split is the number one strategy for ordinary income. Remember when dealing with real estate investing we may have passive or ordinary income and for each type of income there will be a different strategy that in combination, slays some of the tax and provides protection.

Some of the difficulties with the S-corp. if you want to really nitpick are, it is inflexible in moving long-term real estate in and out and you have to do a quarterly payroll. The payroll is simple to deploy but you need to find a cost-effective tax preparer who will do it or use a payroll company and it should not cost an arm and a leg to get done but the savings will substantially offset this expense. A good rule of thumb on when it makes sense to have an S-corp is around $50,000 or more of ordinary income.

If you’re not doing anything but buying and holding then you’ll want to consider a limited liability company (LLC). You will not get the abatement in self-employment tax but you have liability protection and an opportunity to do some creative estate planning to avoid future estate taxes. Owning a small business for rental real estate is an excellent strategy since it may convert personal expenses to business expenses that will offset income even if you are currently an employee receiving a W-2 from an employer. The LLC also limits a creditor to a charging order which is an assignment of income and many LLCs do not distribute or can elect to not distribute thereby making this a hopeless remedy for the creditor. Contrariwise, a limited partnership can be foreclosed upon by statute in California.

Sometimes clients are told to use an LLC and have their S-corporation be the general partner of their family limited partnership (FLP) and this can create vulnerabilities to the stock of that S-corporation by a lawsuit that occurs outside of the LLC activities. The strongest portfolios seem to be those that have a combination of active real estate investing e.g., fix & flips, rehab, and passive in the form of rental real estate which can then be used to offset income of the active investing, however, this requires use of two entities.

In closing, clients are often confused where the best place is to set up there entity because they hear all the radio ads about Nevada. If you are a resident of California, you will not save any taxes by forming your entity out of the state. There other states that have stronger protection (e.g. Delaware) and under the Supreme Court Doctrine of the Internal Affairs, a corporation will be governed by the state of incorporation but any disputes arising will have the law of the jurisdiction where the dispute occurs applied. For example, if you are incorporated in Delaware and hold Texas property and encounter a challenge in Texas, Texas law will be applied but how the corporation is run and its structure should be preserved under the state of incorporation which would be Delaware.

If you have any questions about setting up your real estate investing business you need to find a great team for the tax and legal strategies. The best is usually an attorney and CPA who are also investors and understand the merits of owning real estate. This is only a broad brush stoke on the possibilities and each persons circumstances are different so you would need to be evaluated, as one size does not fit all.

Happy investing,

James Burns, Esq.