Is Advanta in Breach of Contract on Credit Cards?

As of July 30, 2009 – Advanta Bank Corp. stated that they were closing all business credit card accounts. They cited in the letters that went out that an independent trust which owned the balances cards and provides funding for new transactions was pulling out. As such, you need to keeping paying your balance but Advanta will be unable to provide further credit.

Now under basic contract law which is the thread between your agreement with credit card companies there is an offer, acceptance and consideration. Advanta offered me credit and I accepted and the consideration is the the act of providing credit with my obligation to pay it back with interest. Now, as a result of Advanta losing a trust that was funding these, they suddenly are in breach in my mind and as a result, they are asking me to modify my agreement without new consideration which is a requirement to modify the terms of any agreement.

A breach occurs when the bargained-for exchange is not honored by the other party, in this case Advanta Bank Corp. I believe I’m entitled to an order of performance which is the extension of credit otherwise what incentive do I have to pay back any balance on this card? They have not offered me additional consideration like to pay less or go without interest and I think this is not only a breach but unconscionable that Advanta could not act it good faith and fair dealing and assumes the public is stupid and unaware of their rights.

I implore all consumers, if your card is cut off please get a copy of your original agreement and all addendum and see if they have the ability to do this or take the credit card company to arbitration since they make that a part of the agreement. I intend to call and get my card settled for a lot less since they are in non-performance and breaching their agreement.

Wake up and take back your power and let them know you’re not going to be insulted and slapped around any longer. Chime in and let us know about your credit card stink by leaving a message below.

Sincerely,

James Burns, Esq.

California’s New Foreclosure Law

As a result of the subprime loan market collapse, numerous bills were introduced this year in the California Legislature, including the recently enacted SB 1137.  Within this highly charged political environment, the California Land Title Association (CLTA), along with trustees, escrow companies, and lender groups originally opposed this legislation, which subsequently underwent a series of significant amendments before being signed by the Governor earlier this week.

SB 1137 became effective July 8th as an urgency measure.  However, requirements pertaining to the notice of default and the posting and mailing of an entirely new notice will not become operative until 60 days after the effective date.

The provisions of the new law outlined below apply to loans secured by owner occupied residential real property and made between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007.  These provisions will remain effective until January 1, 2013.  The requirements are extensive and the full act text should be consulted for details.

1. A Notice of Default (NOD) may not be filed by the trustee or lender until 30 days after contact is made in person or by telephone with a borrower to asses their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure, or until 30 days after satisfying specified due diligence requirements.
2. During the initial contact the borrower must be advised of the right to request a subsequent meeting.  If a meeting is requested then it must be scheduled within 14 days.
3. An assessment of the borrower’s financial situation and discussion of options may occur at the first contact or at the subsequent meeting, but in either case the borrower must be provided a toll-free number for HUD certified housing counseling agencies.
4. A NOD must include a declaration that the borrower has been contacted or due diligence has been used to try to contact the borrower or that the borrower has surrendered the property.  Due diligence includes having a link to information on the options to avoid foreclosure on the web site of the beneficiary or their agent.
5. If a NOD was filed prior to the effective date of the new law, without a subsequent notice of rescission, then a new declaration must be included as part of the notice of sale.  The declaration must state that the borrower either was contracted to assess their financial situation and explore options to avoid foreclosure or that no contact occurred; in which case the efforts made to contact the borrower must be listed.
6. A NOD may be filed when a borrower has not been contacted as required by the new law if the failure to contact the borrower occurred despite the due diligence of the lender or their agent.  The actions that constitute due diligence are listed in the new law.
7. A new notice has been created by the law and must be posted and mailed at the same time a notice of sale is posted.  The notice advises residents that the property may be sold and that their right to continue to reside in the property may be affected, along with certain other information.

If you have questions please send us an e-mail or if your facing a personal crisis with your mortgage because it has spiked out of control with the interest rate or you owe more than the home is worth and will be worth for years to come we may have legal solutions for you that can put you on the track to recovery. Please download the form on this page and fax it to us available Right here.