-
Tax-free Retirement Planning that is hard to outlive in Orange County, California
Posted on November 17th, 2010 No commentsDue to the rise in our deficit (paying $1 trillion per year on interest only) we are headed for higher tax brackets. The only way you’ll NOT run out of money is if you have some tax free strategies in your retirement plan. As you can see from the graph, sometimes tax-free is actually more when you consider how much you need to make just to cover the taxes and the haircut it gives your funds. To find your equivalent taxable rate you take the rate of return and divide that by your tax bracket (e.g., 28% etc.) and viola you have your equivalent taxable rate. In the example if you’re earning 4.5% in a tax free vehicle, and are at a 28% tax bracket…you’re earning the equivalent of 6.25% because you’re tax free and that is significant.
I have seen several clients retire on their IRA or 401(k) and they get hammered at ordinary tax rates usually in a higher tax bracket if they’ve been deliberate in being successful. You can always retire poor and live on the system while it is available but I don’t think people set out to do that…at least I hope they’re not going into retirement poverty by choice. Out of 100 people turning 65 right now, only 4 of them will be financially independent and the rest will be reliant on family, charity, government or a large portion are still working. In fact there was an article about octogenarian’s having to go back into the work force because they’ve run out of money. The typical deferral for all those years only lasts 18 to 24 months of your retirement as taxes ravage your income and usually without the tax deductions. Also, if you don’t take the distributions (MRD) by the time you’re 70 1/2 there is a penalty of 50% + the ordinary tax, about 70 to 75% of that distribution is devoured just because you didn’t need it and the government forces you to or they’ll penalize you.
Here are a few thoughts if you don’t want to end up as a greeter for a convenience or department store, you know the places I’m talking about. Also some are working as fast food window servers, tele-marketers, night watch persons, seat attendants at stadiums and I was at a restaurant recently and saw one on one knee with knee pads scrapping gum off the floor and this was not a hobby. Think about how difficult these things really are to do when you slow down and the body and mind don’t function like they used to. You are supposed to be doing other things…my people like to go on trips and send me post cards from exotic places. Some like to volunteer and give back to charity…but no schedule of showing up 8am to 6pm with an hour lunch.
So what do I need to be thinking about? Well, I’m glad you asked because here is the personal inventory:
- What are my current retirement assets earning?
- How much are the costs/fees associated with my current investments?
- Are they tax-free?
- Do I qualify for ROTH IRA or a self-directed solo-401(k) ROTH since I’m self-employed?
- Are there any Municipal Bonds I could use?
- Do I have savings grade life insurance that builds up tax deferred and is accessed tax-free and carries a death benefit and final expense?
Most people do not follow or track their portfolio and know what they’re earning, they just know it is down or up but don’t even know by how much. The old adage of when does a negative -30 + 43 = 0 does not seem to resonate with most and there needs to be more accountability on our future retirees to know what they have and what it is doing. We know one geo-political event like terrorism can knock our market down by 50% and they are trying something every few months. The market was devastated for a long time after 9/11 and many people lost millions over night and never recovered since stocks tanked in March 2003.
Are there any municipalities we can rely on that are not running their budget like a ponzi scheme since they are taking in tax dollars to pay for last year’s expenses and just raising taxes. It is only a matter of time before things catch up with some of these local governments and a scary domino effect starts. While I like real estate there have been some many pirates schlepping that stuff and the only one making money is the pirate because they are buying low and selling really high to unsuspecting people because it is hard to really get into the numbers on a property unless you visit the area and bring in all the factors.
We are running out of time before some of the nastier taxes tucked into the Health Care Reform act take effect as well as The Deficit Reduction Act gets full swing for people to start taking back their retirement and stop the bleeding that will occur on your nest-egg when you start taking out the income at the higher ordinary income rates.
In your service,
James Burns, Esq.
(949) 231-9979
-
Uncle Sam’s Snake Oil
Posted on October 4th, 2010 1 commentUncle Sam and his band of merry-men, better known as Congress, have been pushing snake oil on the unsuspecting public in the form of retirement plans. But wait, isn’t a pension plan one of the perks we look to when shopping for an employer? Well, not all pension planning is created equal and in most cases, quite disastrous.
Distributions from all qualified plans must begin no later than April 1st of the calendar year following the year that the participant attains age 70 1/2, or the calendar year in which the employee retires. Special rules apply if the distribution is made to a 5 percent owner of the business. The purpose of minimum distribution rules for retirement plans is to force the owner or participant of the pension plan to withdraw money from the plans, thus triggering an income tax on these monies. On April 16, 2002, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations as to these distributions.
Generally, the idea pursuant to the regulations is to have the owner or participant of the pension plan begin taking the money out of the pension plan beginning at the later of when he finishes working or age 70.5. One purpose of this is to insure that these monies will be subject to income tax prior to the death of the owner.[1]
Based on the current system the government has created with pension plans, the average retired couple will pay eight to twelve times more in taxes on their IRAs and 401(k)s during their retirement years than they saved during their contribution and accumulation years.[2] Generally, it is understood that you put money into your pension plan and tax is deferred and this is a great thing. Unfortunately, you may well be in a higher tax bracket if your pension accumulation is done right.
In addition to a higher tax bracket upon reaching retirement, many people find themselves with a free and clear home; they no longer have mortgage interest deductions to offset income tax. Many Americans find they are now paying back everything they saved in taxes during their accumulation and contributions years within the first two years of distributions. Therefore, there is an insidious income tax awaiting most people and if they didn’t plan their estates, double taxation in the form of both income and estate tax.
Many postpone the transfer of their qualified funds until age 59 ½ in order to avoid the 10% tax penalty. Sometimes by delaying the payment of taxes, retirees will find themselves in a higher tax bracket after age 59 ½ because Congress could raise tax rates because of a political change. Inevitably, one must pay the piper now or later.
What is the answer? Simple, savings grade life insurance. This type of life insurance is not the same as the one you get countless letters about in the mail. This is life insurance that is focused on building up a triple compound because it is tax deferred. The difference between the deferral that life insurance experiences and pension plans is that when it comes time for payout, life insurance is received as a loan. This is a powerful concept because the proceeds will not be taxed; loans are not a form of taxable income. However, as a loan you will have interest on the payments. Most people mistakenly think they are going to pay interest on their own money with life insurance. While in theory that is true, the best insurance carriers provide for zero wash loans where the interest basically is forgiven or taken out of the death benefit when a person passes on. We are talking about real life insurance not the typical death insurance that most people have because you use it while you’re alive.
The best candidates for creating amazing wealth with Savings grade life insurance are those in the age rages of thirty to fifty. Once committed and in the proper product it is foreseeable they will retire wealthy and without the annoying taxation that surrounds a pension plan. There are even strategies to start a contribution plan to your investment that only requires repositioning your current finances.
Social Security received a 2.7 percent boost in 2005, but Medicare will continue to eat up much of the increase and when the 79 million qualifying Americans sign-up – for Social Security look out below. This does not even account for the bail out with TARP funds that President Obama awarded bankers and the fact we are headed for Debtflation.
James Burns, Esq.Attorney-at-LawAuthor: The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth949) 231-9979
[1] . Mitchell J. Kassoff, Basic Taxation and other Implications of Pension Plan Distributions, <http://www.franatty.cnc.net/pension.htm>
[2] . Douglas R. Andrews: Missed Fortune – Dispel the Money Myth-Conceptions- Isn’t It Time You Became Wealthy? p. 226.
asset protection, business, credit card, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, mortgage, News, retirement, Succession planning 401(k), 401k plan, 529, asset allocation, bonds, capital gains, commodities, consumer protection, credit cards, credit scores, defaults, dividends, economy, estate tax, ETFs, family finances, family money, Fidelity, fiduciary standard, financial advisers, financial aid, financial reform, foreclosure, healthcare reform, insurance, investment grade life insurance, IRA, Managing healthcare costs, marriage penalty, mortgages, municipal bonds, mutual funds, Pimco, real estate recession, retirement, risk, saving for college, savings grade life insurance, SEC, social security, sovereign debt crisis, stocks strategic, taxes, TIPS trusts, Vanguard -
Long Term Nursing Care – are your prepared?
Posted on September 29th, 2010 No commentsMany states have a high cost for long term care and nursing but California is very explosive in expenses.
State Median Annual Care Costs for 2010 are:
Nursing Home Care
- Private Room $87,345
- Semi-private Room $73,000
Assisted Living Facility
- Private, one bedroom $42,000
Adult Day Health Care
- Adult day health care $20,020
Home Care
- Home health aide $46,904
- Homemaker Services $45,646
The statistics are that 7 in 10 people will require one of these types of long term care in their senior years. The question is what have you done to take care of this potential problem?
You need to look at a long term care policy or better yet, an insurance policy that provides for supplemental retirement income but also has living benefits if you need them like nursing care. To ignore the numbers is to ignore a fact like you’re going to get old and that everyone has to pay taxes. You need to be responsible to your loved ones and in order to preserve all that you are and have worked for from going out the window to pay for this.
James Burns, Esq.
www.jamesgburns.com
asset protection, business, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, News, retirement, Succession planning 401(k), 401k plan, 529, AARP, addult day health care, asset allocation, asset protection, assisted living, assisted living facility, bonds, capital gains, commodities, consumer protection, credit cards, credit scores, debt crisis, Department of Education, dividends, economy, Education, education crisis, estate tax, ETFs, family finances, family money, Fidelity, fiduciary standard, financial advisers, financial aid, financial reform, foreclosure, Genworth, Health Care Reform Act, healthcare reform, insurance, IRA, life insurance, living benefits, living trusts, long term care, Managing healthcare costs, marriage penalty, mortgages, municipal bonds, mutual funds, nursing home, nursing home care, Obama care, Pimco, President Obama, real estate, recession, retirement, retirement risk, saving for college, SEC, seniors, social security, sovereign, stocks, strategic defaults, taxes, Tea Party, TIPS, Vanguard -
Domestic Financial Terrorism – How do we defend?
Posted on September 27th, 2010 No commentsThe level of destruction on our financial system is incredible compared to what even Timothy McVee did as a domestic terrorist. You have to ask yourself who do some of these bankers and investment firms work for when you look at what they’ve done to the once wealthiest nation in the world.
Right now we’ve got $2 trillion in short-term debt that has to be refinanced this year of 2010 and China, India and Russia are not buying. This is not counting the extra deficit spending which should top $1.35 trillion this year…more or less. The fact the countries we’ve relied on are not buying means we have to fire up the printing presses again. We would already acknowledge that we are at a 10% inflation but the money folks have been using tricky phrases like “core inflation” which ignores half the things we spend money on so that way they can keep the numbers looking low.
A great book called This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly by Carmen Reinhard and Kenneth Rogoff shows that EVERY TIME a nation’s debt went above 90% of GDP or Growth Domestic Product…the nation failed. The book studies 25 countries over 800 years and there were NO exceptions to the 90% rule. Every nation that ran their deficits to this 90% ratio is now off the map or turned Third World.
Right now, the US is above 90% and there appears no way to bring it down for decades unless some obscure genius comes out of the woodwork as they are not in the White House, Treasury or Fed.
It is unclear what Americans will do, especially for their retirement as the very tool our bankers use against us (stock market) they expect us to hand over our life’s savings and just be ok with negative 30 or 40% loses. You know, its just the market reacting and it goes up and down. Why is that Ok? Why should we accept losses that take us forever to recover just to get back where we started be considered alright?
We need to redo some of the Healthcare Reform Act that President Obama so valiantly promoted before 2013 when our investments could be ravaged with a sur-tax just because we are in a certain income bracket and that bracket is not hard to be in if you live in a state with a high cost of living. Where is Sarah Palin and the Tea Party when we need them.
It is time to look at guaranteed opportunities that does not go down when the market goes down. When Wall Street was once honorable a man named Benjamin Graham (mentor to Warren Buffet) extolled what was an investment. It preserved principal and gave an adequate return. We need to get back to this simple idea and quit trying to find home runs since base hits get you to home plate just as well.
We also need tax-free strategies to weather the storm our own government and their brainy bankers have left before us. It was like turning on the gas to an already smoldering economy.
James Burns
asset protection, business, estate planning, finance, life insurance, money, News, retirement 401(k), 401k plan, 529, al-Qaeda, annuities, asset allocation, Ben Bernake, bonds, capital gains, China, commodities, consumer protection, credit cards, credit scores, debt, defaults, deficit, dividends, domestic terrorism, economy, equity indexed annuities, estate tax, ETFs, family finances, family money, Fidelity, fiduciary standard, finance, financial advisers, financial aid, financial reform, fixed annuities, foreclosure, GDP, Growth Domestic Product, healthcare reform, inflation, insurance, IRA, Managing healthcare costs, marriage penalty, money, mortgages, municipal bonds, mutual funds, Obama, Pimco, President Obama, real estate recession, retirement, risk, Sarah Palin, saving for college, savings, savings plans, SEC, social security, sovereign debt crisis, stock market, stocks, stocks strategic, taxes, Tea Party, terrorism, TIPS trusts, US Treasury, Vanguard -
Tax Free Retirement Cash Flow
Posted on August 10th, 2009 3 commentsOverfunding is a strategy that focuses on accumulating cash in the policy rather than paying for the death benefit which is the payout to your loved one’s when you pass away. This approach leverages the highest policy premium that is allowed with the lowest life insurance death benefit so that your cash accumulation exceeds your policy net insurance costs over at least 10 years. There are fundamentally 4 steps to determining the combination of maximum premiums and minimum death benefits necessary to selecting the most leveraged indexed universal life policy:
1.
First, determine the person’s maximum premium commitment over a minimum of ten years or more. The premium amount selected should be an amount that they can make regularly whether it is a monthly or annual payment and does not strap their cash flow. Universal life insurance policies offer flexible premium payments, but to get the maximum leverage you have to stay on course with a premium payment.
2.
Secondly, determine the minimum insurance face amount and payment commitment along with your age and gender to make sure the numbers work based on your particulars. Most insurance illustration provide the actual premium amount limits that meet the internal revenue code minimum requirements.
3.
Next, go over the internal rate of return (IRR) of the policy to ensure you’ll be getting the full benefit of the tax-free accumulation versus what an ordinary investment would receive outside of this tax-free environment. Some agent’s illustrate way too high like 8% which is unrealistic. We usually do ours at 5.25% and still kick the pants off other investments.
4. Finally, you must pay close attention to the maximum premiums allowable under the Internal Revenue Code which is referred to as the seven-pay premium limitation.[1] As long as the total premiums for any seven-year period are equal to or less than the maximum allowable premiums for the seven-pay test,[2] you’ll be able to access the cash values in the policy at any time, tax-free and relatively liquid.
In essence, a life insurance contract that fails to meet the seven-pay test will be classified as a modified endowment contract (MEC). The seven-pay test is not met if the accumulated amount paid at any time during the first seven years is more than the total of the net level premiums that would normally have been paid on or before such time if the contract provided for paid-up future benefits after payment of seven level annual premiums
Want to see if this is a fit for you? If you’re healthy it may very well be a great tool in your arsenal to slay the bailout dragon for your retirement.
-
“How to Save Your IRA from Destruction”
Posted on January 1st, 2009 2 commentsIf you have an IRA and you’re concerned about how to pass it on to your loved ones, an approach of naming a trust as the designated beneficiary has several benefits over directly naming the beneficiaries. The issues that can affect the named beneficiary to name a few are they could be a minor, they might not be careful with money, or they may have marital or creditor issues, and could be disabled to the extent the inheritance would affect their governmental benefits. Next, if the beneficiary dies before distribution, the alternate beneficiaries may not be accurate. Another condition we often see is the beneficiary may purposely or accidentally withdraw monies from the IRA causing adverse tax consequences. Additionally naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate language that extends payout called “conduit provisions” may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.
However, in 2005, the IRS issued Private Letter Ruling 200537044 (the “PLR”) that approved a new type of revocable trust created solely to be the beneficiary of an IRA account. As a result of this PLR, it is now possible for you to create an individual trust known as an IRA Beneficiary Trust® which provides maximum protection and flexibility for your retirement investments.
This IRA Beneficiary Trust® insures that your beneficiaries will extend (“stretch-out”) their taxable Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) on the IRA over a much longer period of time. By using this trust, the age of each beneficiary becomes the effective age for that beneficiary’s required minimum distribution. As an effect, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years free of income-tax and may literally grow to be worth millions of dollars! This type of trust goes by many names and has also been called an IRA trust, an IRA Inheritance Trust, a standalone IRA trust, an IRA stretch trust or an IRA protection trust.When your loved one/s inherit your IRA fund and they keep the funds in the IRA over their lives and only take the minimum required distributions each year (the “stretch-out”), the amount of money that can accumulate and be paid to them should be massive in comparison to taking the monies directly and facing the immediate tax on them. For example, assume you have a $150,000 IRA account; we will also further assume you have two different ages (10 and 25) for your beneficiaries and presume that the account averages an annualized 7% return. First, for the beneficiary who is age 35[i] and inherits IRA proceeds upon your departure, the total benefit is $1,212,165 of after-tax benefit as opposed to $663,496 for taking the proceeds directly without the stretch-out. For the 10 year old beneficiary,[ii] they will receive approximately $4,589,236 after-tax benefit as opposed to $2,641,198 which is what they would receive lacking the stretch-out because of the immediate taxes due when they receive your funds directly.
Therefore, you can see that this wealth amassing strategy only works if the beneficiaries hold the inherited funds inside the IRA account. If a beneficiary takes all of the funds out of the IRA account (referred to as a “blow-out” because it blows the stretch-out), this wealth accumulation technique is lost. One great reason to create an IRA Beneficiary Trust® is to preserve the stretch-out and prevent a blow-out. Unfortunately, we see this blow-out too often and it jeopardizes wealth that must be saved. Many times your beneficiaries will not be aware of the tax rules and their distribution choices, so they’ll withdraw from the IRA funds at the first opportunity or do a forbidden rollover. Even if you hope that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing by keeping the funds in the IRA account for their lives to “stretch-out” payments, they may expose it to numerous threats and hope is not a planning strategy as I’ve indicated in my book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth.”
Some of the threats come in the form of a divorce where your beneficiary’s spouse could seek half of the inherited IRA if they live in a community property state. The divorce rate is out of control and a huge numbers of inherited money has become a target for the ex-spouse. Even though inherited property is considered separate property it may become the only thing available and because divorces can be very costly and last for years, your beneficiary may succumb to the pressures of long and nasty divorce litigation and be willing to surrender a large portion of the IRA account just to settle the divorce.
If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.
James Burns, principal of the Law Office of James Burns and author of the international best seller “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” shows unassuming investors how naming a trust as the designated beneficiary of their IRA has several very important advantages over directly naming the beneficiaries.
In addition, Burns says: naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate “conduit-trust” language, may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.
Burns’ office is one of few that offer the IRA Beneficiary Trust® which insures that your beneficiaries “stretch-out” their taxable, required minimum IRA distributions over a much longer period of time. And, if you do it right, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years income-tax free and can literally grow to be worth millions of dollars!
Even if you assume that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing – that is, keep the funds in the IRA account for their lives to maximize the income tax “stretch-out” of the IRA – the IRA may still be seriously exposed to one or more of the following threats that can arise years after you depart.
If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.
The Law Office of James Burns provides debt settlement services, bankruptcies, short sales and estate and wealth planning with emphasis on real estate investing.Untaxingly,
James Burns, Esq.
[i] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA. Your tax bracket is 35%, 25 year olds bracket is 28% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less depending on the market and asset class as one could use self-directed and have non-market assets.
[ii] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA, your tax bracket is 35%, 10 year olds bracket is 10% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less as indicated above.
business, finance, News, real estate, retirement 401(k), 401(k) rollover, 403(b), bank account, Charles Schwab, Chase, finance, individual retirement account, IRA, IRA inheritance trust, IRA protection trust, IRA stretch trust, IRA trust, Morgan Stanley, mutual funds, pension, pension plan, President Obama, retirement, retirement account, retirement communities, ROTH IRA, Sarah Palin, savings, standalone IRA trust, Tea Party -
Tax Free Income for Life
Posted on September 14th, 2008 No commentsI’ve been working on my new program which is going to be essential as Congress is likely to shift the entire marginal tax rate making your deferred plan (IRA or 401(k)) obsolete. You’ll want to take a look at our two vehicle system to build up tax-free.
One of the vehicles is the Solo-401(k) ROTH self-directed plan. This vehicles does not have income limitations on the $165,000 for a couple filing jointly the way the ROTH IRA does. It is designed for solo-practitioners, those without employees or contractors or part-time people.
Since it is ROTH you pay your taxes up front but never pay again on the build-up or when you take monies out in the future. Traditional deferred plans allow you to defer taxes but get hammered when you retire if you are in a higher tax bracket and without tax deductions to offset which is uniformly the case for a retiree.
You can contribute up to 25% of compensation and additional catch-up is available for those 50 or older. A $41,000 annual limit applies and is indexed in the future up to 2010 unless the new regime changes things when they are sworn in as President and one could be higher than the other. A cap of $205,000 on compensation was in force as of 2004 and is indexed up to 2010. The benefit is that you can set aside more tax-free money in the solo-401(k) ROTH than other plan choices and if it is self-directed, you do have to remain victim to what the market provides as you can have numerous choices for guranteed returns that are not connected to the market at all.
Remember this is just one half of a dynamic duo that provides for tax-free income for life. You’ll want to examine the seld-directed arena so that you’re not held to just mutual funds and other market connected investments that are roller coaster driven because they are up and down according to whimsical financial and political events.
If you have questions or are looking to set one up or need information on the “Dynamic Duo” you can find our e-book “Tax Free Income for Life” available on the website.
Untaxingly,
James Burns


