• To Dream the Impossible Dream - Beating the Stock Market

    Posted on June 18th, 2010 James No comments

    A few years ago after reviewing some portfolios for clients that tried their hand in stock market trading it was obvious to me that they were gambling as if they were at the roulette table in Vegas. As someone who has worked for a billionaire and observed the asset class relative to stock, the investments were safe blue chip stocks, bonds, Treasuries and Index funds because it is next to impossible to beat the market.  I then wrote my first book The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth that discusses the fundamentals of what is an investment and what to look for every-time you start to consider an investment.  Benjamin Graham who was the mentor of Warren Buffet stated an investment was something that preserved principal and provided and adequate return.

    In the book we also discuss John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard Investments, views on investing and trying to beat the market. Mr. Bogle’s academic research proved that virtually no one could consistently beat the market over long stretches (like the 35 years we have to invest for retirement). The best you could hope for was to meet the market, which gave you returns that weren’t half bad. in my book we recount the research of looking at 355 mutual funds over the 35 years and that only 3 of them did anything compelling and that was in line with what the S&P 500 did. Hence, the idea is that going forward how would the average person who works uncover those 3 funds out of the masses; you can’t is the answer.

    To this end, Mr. Bogle said we need to invest in a broad swath of stocks and bonds through low-cost index funds and forget about your portfolio. Spend your time living your life instead of researching stocks and bonds. That’s much more fun than sweating over investments anyway. If you’re going to research anything it would be real estate and starting your own business as other assets.

    The other pundit of the idea that almost no one beats the market is Terrance Odean, a Berkeley professor who proved Bogle’s theory from another perspective. The more you trade, the more you lose, Odean discovered by examining the real-life portfolios and trading patterns of thousands of investors. His paper, Boys Will Be Boys, is a must-read for anyone who is trying to retire in comfort and not run out of money and for those who think they’re going to outsmart the stock market. You know the guys who have a super large screen in their office and they seem to be following the market and making trades. What they are really doing is creating taxes with capital gains and many of them short term which costs more, all for what?

    Steady and consistent gets to the finish line if we remember what Aesop tried to teach us in the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. The best way to invest with success is to get base hits and not try to get a home run all the time. If we look at baseball, a home run is great but really you accomplish more if you get a base hit and move it one base at a time to home plate; this is better than striking out.

    James Burns, Esq.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • Was Gary Coleman’s Plug Pulled Without His Will?

    Posted on June 3rd, 2010 James No comments

    As Gary Coleman was unconscious in the hospital, his ex-wife, Shannon, gave the order to pull the plug.  Now Coleman’s parents have come forward accusing the hospital of stopping the life support prematurely without the proper permission, saying Shannon no longer had the right as she was not his wife.  The hospital does not seem to be concerned because Gary had his health care power of attorney on file (AKA: living will) giving Shannon the authority as his Agent.  This is a case to get your affairs in order like NOW.  Have you signed your own health care power of attorney?

    Get answers:

    James Burns, Esq.

    (949) 440-3243

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • Obama and The Fate of your Estate

    Posted on December 13th, 2009 James No comments

    We are getting closer to some permanency in terms of future estate tax. US Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D - SD) has stated that  nearly every family, farmer and small business in America will be exempt from paying any estate tax under a bill passed by the House of Representatives on December 3, 2009.

    The Permanent Estate Tax Relief for Families, Farmers, and Small Businesses Act of 2009 (HR 4154), authored by Pomeroy, would make  the 2009 estate tax exemption level of USD $3.5m permanent for an individual ($7m for a married couple) and a maximum tax rate of 45%.  The bill also maintains the “step-up in basis” tax rules, which protect many heirs from paying additional capital gains taxes on appreciated assets they inherit.

    The bill was approved by 225 votes to 200, but must be passed by the Senate and signed by President Obama before it can become law.

    Without change, the estate tax is scheduled to enter one year of full repeal (no taxes at all) in 2010 followed by a return of the estate tax in 2011 with much lower exemption amount ($1,000,000m per person or $2,000,000 for a married couple) and a much higher maximum tax rate (55%)…ouch!!!

    The one year of estate tax repeal was also coupled with the enactment of  “carryover basis” tax rules, which will require heirs in 2010 to pay capital gains taxes on inherited assets based on the decedent’s original purchase price.

    Under the step-up in basis rules, continued under Pomeroy’s bill, the value of the asset is calculated at the time of the decedent’s death. It is claimed that preserving the step-up in basis rules will protect small businesses from paying an estimated $34,000,000,000 billion in capital gains taxes so who knows if this bill will make it because they could really use this to pay for bailout and TARP funds.

    According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, the continuation of the$7m exemption for couples will help the vast majority of family farmers, as the average farm household’s net worth ranged from $586,000 for small farms to $2,200,000m for very large farms in 2008.

    “By making the 2009 estate tax level permanent, we will make the estate tax go away for 99.75% of all percent of families, farmers, and small businesses in this country,” Pomeroy observed, concluding that: “It’s time to resolve this issue once and for all, and this bill is the fair way to do it.”

    We so desperately need to know the rules of the game so we can start playing to win it again and hopefully Senate and the President can get on board and make this happen.

    Untaxingly,

    James Burns, Esq.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • “Six Secrets of How Wealthy Landowners Protect Themselves From Lawsuits”

    Posted on September 28th, 2009 James No comments

    I recently read that a lawsuit is filed every 13 minutes of every working day in California and this disease is proliferating throughout the country.

    In addition, the toxic substance and mold litigation is on a rise with multi-million dollar verdicts against the landowners.

    Over 80 million lawsuits are filed each year in the U.S. Each year trial attorneys create new causes of action aimed at the perceived deep pockets of businesses and individuals. For instance, most people are familiar with the infamous McDonald’s hot coffee case and lately, the mold cases. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on January 22, 2003, that tenants of an apartment building in Hayward are suing the owner for five million dollars for mold related injuries. Mold damage awards in recent cases have been so great that the major property insurance companies are reluctant to write policies in California. It may be a limitation or exclusion in your policy.

    Mistake Number One - Not understanding the implications of how you own your real property.

    The inexperienced landowner holds all their property as themselves, jointly, or as “joint tenants”. In some cases this can work, but in many cases it can be the cause of an expensive and devastating mistake.

    With the proliferation of mold cases mounting, it is a best practice to not hold investment property in your own name because insurance will not cover these claims.

    The wealthy and experienced real estate investor knows that they have to use a limited liability entity to hold the property creating a prophylactic between themselves and any liabilities stemming from the property.

    Mistake Number Two - Not knowing which estate-planning document to use so you’ll avoid lawsuits

    Should I use a revocable or irrevocable trust and should it be domestic or foreign?

    A lot of folks don’t know that a revocable trust is only for avoiding probate but offers no creditor protection.

    Depending on timing when a person is sued, there are great opportunities with the right irrevocable domestic trust. On the other hand, there are some really great offshore solutions that allow you to participate in the global equity markets and are experiencing much higher gains than the U.S. market.

    There is also one super investment tool that is protected and avoids capital gains providing far better returns than mutual funds and independent stock investments.

    The experienced real estate investor knows that they should put their home into a plan that will not affect their tax benefits but still render solid protection from a creditor by using the right tool.

    Mistake Number Three – Holding Too Much Equity in Your Home.

    If a creditor can’t get at cash, they go after real estate. The best place to start is with the roof over your head. Most states are experiencing record appreciation which means there is a lot of equity in many homes.

    But how much interest is this equity earning? There are products where you could be investing some of the equity proceeds and earning more than you’re paying for the loan. The wealth minded landowner leverages everything, earns on that leverage and tries to reduce ownership.

    Some superior mortgage products are on the market that will keep your equity down while you live in the home. At first blush, it sounds contrary to common thinking. Nonetheless, the wealthy person puts everything at their disposal to work to create extraordinary wealth, even home equity.

    Doesn’t it make more sense to tie the money up in investments that earn and keep your home safe?

    Mistake Number Four – Not Keeping Adequate Property Insurance

    A good insurance policy can provide a solid first line of defense. However, you must be aware of its limitations.

    General business insurance policies insure against accidents on the business property such as slip and falls and fire and equipment malfunction. These policies often exclude accidents occurring outside the scope of employment, an intentional act by an owner or employee, contract claims and working at home.

    Liability policies for professionals such as doctors, dentists, attorneys, architects, engineers and accountants also have exclusions from coverage such as grossly negligent acts, willful or wanton misconduct, punitive damages and liability related to product liability.

    Personal liability insurance policies include auto, homeowners and umbrella coverage. If a plaintiff’s damages exceed your auto policy limits, you will be personally liable for the balance. Homeowner’s insurance policies provide insurance for damage to the residence caused by acts of God, insects and often construction defects. The policies often exclude coverage for any business activities at the home. Umbrella insurance policies are a relatively inexpensive way to supplement auto and homeowners policy limits, but they are not complete. Umbrella policies generally exclude coverage for dangerous sports, dangerous equipment such as guns, trampolines, swimming pools and sometimes lawn mowers, chain saws and power tools. In addition, such policies may exclude dog bites, intentional acts and business activities.

    Another problem with relying exclusively on insurance is the risk that your insurance company may not be in business when you file a claim. The Wall Street Journal reported on January 30, 2003, that a rash of insolvencies among insurers is resulting in hundreds of thousands of consumers at risk of not collecting on their claims. The problem is growing as more and more insurance companies are filing for bankruptcy.

    While insurance is a good first step, it not always reliable. The experienced real estate investor never relies on one tool but uses all tools in their tool belt to protect themselves.

    Mistake Number Five- Not Avoiding Probate

    Multiple Probates. If you have real property in multiple states, then you will have to probate the property in each state.  That means attorney fees in each state, potentially larger probate fees in other states, and the administrative burden of multiple state probates. The average is 3% to 8% of the gross estate, if you compound this by five or more states your estate is in trouble.

    Along with protective features, a good plan should tie into your estate plan so that you avoid multiple probates. Our office and the tools we use on a daily basis to take care of clients can accomplish this very easily.

    Mistake Number Six - Procrastinating

    This is likely the biggest and most costly mistake the novice real property investor makes. The wealthy real property investor always takes out time to do proper planning because the alternative could be catastrophic.

    If you want to avoid these outcomes, you need to take a little bit of time out of your schedule and plan.

    The truth is with proper planning almost anyone can dramatically improve their estate, business and retirement plan.

    Due to the complexities of estate preservation planning (“Asset Protection”) and the many changes slated to occur, it’s extremely difficult to explain each application of these strategies here in print.

    While one client may be able to benefit from a strategy by using it one way, another client may be able to benefit from a different application of the same strategy. Everyone’s situation is like a snowflake, no two are alike.

    If any of these strategies make as much sense to you as they have for America’s wealthiest landowners, then we invite you to contact us for more information on how to do the same.

    You can also find out more by reading the “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” which is sold at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Borders and other fine book stores.


    James Burns, Esq.

    www.jamesgburns.com

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • Invest Like the Wealthy and Wise

    Posted on August 3rd, 2009 James No comments

    When a judgment is won against a person for a particular amount, the first choice is cash. The next choice would be the quick sale value of real estate, including forcing foreclosure on your home. One of my colleagues still does this work to this day and while he does not enjoy having people removed from their homes, he has to get paid along with his client and that means every asset is up for grabs.

    If the bank and other friendly creditors own the property then there is nothing to turn over. At the end of the day, the creditor or their counsel is looking for how much equity you have in the home.

    If you are in business or have a sizable estate, you may want to keep your equity lean so that it is off the negotiation table. Stripping equity makes sense on so many accounts. First, we’ve all heard the cliché that it is unwise to have all your eggs in one basket. Why? Because if you drop the basket with all your eggs they are all finished. The old adage is not just for the sake of it but is a wise wealth-making concept. Do you think the folks in Laguna Beach whose homes slide down the side of the hill were better off if the home was completely paid or outside of that home earning interest somewhere or invested in another piece of property? I hope the answer is obvious to you that you would want it outside of that now demolished home so that you had access to it.

    Where should I put it you ask? Many readers are using real estate in multiple jurisdictions and this makes sense. You should not keep more than 10% of your equity in the properties unless that would not pencil out properly in having the renter cover your loan. The other significant asset many clients are using is savings grade life insurance because this contract can be structured to not provide for creditors of the beneficiary during a period when you are under attack. You can also put a large amount into a single premium immediate annuity (SPIA) that is irrevocable and you divest your control over it while it pays directly to the insurance company to fund your tax-advantaged savings account, better known as the investment grade life insurance.

    If you’re not sure about investments, you can also get personal equity lines from family and friendly companies. A good idea is to get a loan from family members, create a functional promissory not that has flexible payments and higher interest rate for the premium of having the flexibility e.g., pay in lump sum 5 years from now. Then they put a deed of trust on the property and that encumbers a portion of the equity.

    This process involves:

    A friendly third party that holds a lien on your property.  This friendly party may be a corporation, which you control.  The “friendly” corporation places liens against your real estate and other immovable assets to strip the valuable equity.

    HIGH ASSET PROFILE

    Before:

    Appraised Value $200,000

    - $40,000/Mortgage             

    + $160,000 = Equity (at risk)

    Now this same asset with an equity strip.

    After:

    Appraised Value $200,000

    - $40,000/Mortgage

    - $150,000/ Lien

    + $10,000 = Equity

    Real estate is immovable.  Therefore, there are specific challenges to reducing the amount of equity accessible to abusive creditors.  We reduce the equity, through equity stripping.

    This process works wonders along with a Delaware Series LLC because you can have a property seeded in one of the Series and another Series that has its own bank account and name as a creditor on the property with a filed deed of trust on the property. You have to create a credible document to substantiate the financial substance but this is done all the time with businesses and real property to keep the ownership reduced.

    What if I lose a case and a creditor finds out I control the entity that has a lien against the property. This is one of the little risks but is difficult to lose as long as you run your entity like it has a real business purpose and respect the transaction like it is a true arm’s length dealing.

    You can always use a global solution as many of my clients have using a foreign bank to take out up to 90% of the available equity and then settling the money on a trust that has an agreement with the bank to oversee it. The capital never transfers out of the jurisdiction, costs about 1.5% per year on the loan amount to maintain, offers a rate of return on the CD that offsets other fees so it is a wash but it protects property like nobody’s business. There are so many interesting ways to provide for estate taxes, create wealth abroad that is legitimate and protects the money that we can explain them all in this article but we invite any of Rick Stuart’s readers to request an appointment if they have any concerns in their financial and estate planning strategy. Even that little hairline fracture left untreated over time can have cataclysmic results in your financial planning structure.

    James Burns

    Law Office of James Burns

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • Guaranteed Modification

    Posted on June 26th, 2009 James No comments

    A lot of people tell me about companies that offer a guarantee for modification services and my reply  is: “who do you know that has called them on it?” There is usually dead silence because how good is a guarantee? It is only as good as a company is prepared to honor it so examine all the small print. There are not many companies that can afford to expend resources on a modification win or lose and not get compensated.

    From the law office standpoint I liken it to the same set of circumstances as if I was to represent a person in court, I cannot guarantee the outcome and to do so is unethical because you, the client might not give me all the facts or can withhold information about trying to do it on your own previously and then we try and encounter huge obstacles. I’ve had clients that did their own submissions and failed (because they gave too much or wrong information) and they don’t tell us and then we meet with resistance. Now we’ve been able to get them through but because this happens there is no way to guarantee the outcome and we expend thousands of dollars of time and effort in each case so we just cannot offer a refund. Our guarantee is best efforts and if your situation is modifiable you’ll get modified and we don’t even need to go there about rejection and if that happens, maybe it is exactly what needs to happen because not only does the person not qualify for the home now, they won’t be able to afford it with any program so they should think short sale and move on. Many properties will not make sense and most banks do not offer a principal reduction because they cannot get permission from their investors to eat that much of their expected profits. The old adage of when does a negative -30 + 43 = 0 and that is any time the market goes down 30% it has to get back to 43% just to put you back where you were before it dropped.  I see many instances where the properties are down 50% and the borrower might now recover the home value in their life time and getting out with a short sale really makes financial sense.

    On the fees, if you’re using a law firm and they are going to give it to you for a fixed fee, grab that and run if it is around $3,000 to $4,000. When I was at a law firm we had software that started to calculate our hourly from the time the phone was picked up until we hung it up and we were taught to keep the client on the phone and run it up. Every fax that went out was $1.00 per page and every photo-copy was .30 cents per page.  The hourly of an experienced real estate or finance attorney is going to be $375.00 per hour or more and they may have processors or paralegals that are going to be $100 to $150 per hour. When you average 40 to 100 hours per file you are going to get your money’s worth because it takes hour upon hour and constant follow-up with the banks…more than most people who work will every have. I can’t see a modification starting out less than $5,500 under typical law firm billing and the client could expect to get a back-end invoice for about the same because of the time and expenses for faxing, photo-copying and FedEx that takes place. Therefore, a completed modification would normally be upwards of $10,000 by the time it is done. Grab a modification for a fixed $3,000 to $4,000 because it is a super deal.

    You can always go to a non-lawyer but you are really putting yourself in a position to have your documents used against you since a broker or any other helper cannot afford you the attorney/client privilege. You need to make sure your submission is not used as a smoking gun against you especially if you were a stated income loan and you and your broker or loan officer expanded your income for the purpose of qualifying on the loan.

    If you want solid assistance at a fixed legal fee price, please contact my office.

    Sincerely,

    James Burns, Esq.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • “Buying Foreclosure Without the Exposure”

    Posted on January 12th, 2009 James No comments

    Start your retirement planning early

    Real estate investing is exciting because we get the opportunity to use wealth pillars like leverage which allows ordinary people the ability to considerable wealth in a short time; I know because I’ve seen it happen. Another exciting aspect is there are always opportunities to make strong returns, regardless of how the market is doing and right now that is especially true as we bear witness to hundreds of thousands of foreclosure nationally per month. But like other forms of investments, real estate investing takes discipline, education and smart decision making to become successful. I’ve met with clients who made impulse purchases and the result is usually disaster.

    There are fundamentally at least eleven reasons why real estate deals are always available no matter what the real estate market is doing. There is no magic here, just human circumstances that create opportunity if you know how to look for them.

    1. Divorce
    2. Job loss
    3. Job relocation
    4. Bankruptcy
    5. Health problems
    6. Incarceration
    7. Reduced income – market conditions
    8. Death
    9. Failed business
    10. Military duty or activation
    11. Adjustable rate mortgages – on stated income that was unreal

    Right now all eleven of these personal circumstances are widespread since American is in two military conflicts, unemployment expands monthly, record business failures and layoffs and numerous professional incomes reduced due to market conditions. In my own practice of modifying loans I see that there was a serious abuse of the stated income loan that has now come to boil and are popping left and right leaving folks unable to make the payments. The inability to make adjusted payments should be no surprise as there was no way for them to ever afford the home with their current income.

    Enter the REO. An REO (real-estate-owned) is a form of distressed property and is similar to buying a short sale (sale of a home for less than the owner owed), except the property is already back in the possession of the lender or bank through the foreclosure process. In an REO situation the banks end up owning the property when no one bids to cover the amount owed against the property at a public auction. REO homes are often considered the best way to buy a distressed property because the seller is already out of the picture. It’s just the investor or their agent, the bank or the bank’s agent negotiating the transaction. Some REOs can be purchased directly from the lender for pennies on the dollar especially for those who can buy them in bulk. However, if you combine the purchase of an REO with a system for investing where you don’t have to do anything but collect your checks then you can leverage your time and resources to make and find more opportunities.

    Normally REOs are purchased on what is referred to as tapes and the more money you have to spend the better the tape but on these large tapes there are the good, the bad and the ugly which are properties that you wouldn’t want because the fix up costs eat into the profits. Also, to get really good deals or the actual pennies on the dollar you have to come in with millions if not billions the way the hedge funds do who typically have purchased most of the good deals by the time the individual investors or small investor pools can get a hold of the REOs. Nevertheless, there is an old fashion way of acquiring these properties if you have the time to fly all over to numerous states and get into the underground or you can rely on a systematized approach to investing in this distressed market where you’re able to not only get all good properties (bedroom communities), the system operators actually cherry pick and buy properties that are livable, fix them up bring you not only positive monthly cash flow from your systematized property but also has built-in exit strategies that put a cash windfall on top of your positive cash flow.

    All the most successful business in America follows a system. Once you have real estate you are in business in a sense, you’ve become a real estate entrepreneur and why wouldn’t you want a system to take care of your investing? To make sure we understand what a system is specifically here is a great definition: System (from Latin systma, in turn from Greek systma) is a set of interacting or interdependent relationships, real or abstract, forming an integrated whole. The concept of an ‘integrated whole’ can also be stated in terms of a system embodying a set of relationships which are differentiated from relationships of the set to other elements, and from relationships between an element of the set and elements not a part of the relational regime.[i] Now this is just a very technical way of saying things that work together or “special sauce” if we were to look at Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC™).

    The system works like this, you buy the property, management places a new buyer in the home that will pay you the going rate for rent is in the area as their new mortgage payment to you, and you’ve just become the bank. For example, say rents at the local apartment are $500 and you only make $1,000 to $1,500 net after taxes. If I came up to you and said hey, “how would you like to own a home for $500 down and $500 per month,” the same you’re paying right now in rent, what would the reasonable person do? They are going to want to own and you have them on a land contract, no landlord/tenant relationship here so you don’t fix sinks, toilets or anything else…it is their home. You just hold this contract like the bank and are akin to the note which is reverse engineered at $500 at 10% time 10 years amortized. Did you get a deal? Of course you did and until this person repairs their credit so did they because we made it affordable just like a car dealer would…it’s all about the payment.

    Management collects your $500 per month minus a 10% servicing fee for collecting and disbursing your money and making a website available to you on line where you can manage your property and check on it and see pictures both interior and exterior.

    The lynchpin in this type of investing is the land contract. A land contract (sometimes known as a “contract for deed” or an “installment sale agreement”) is an agreement between the owner of a property and a person who wants to buy the property for an agreed-upon purchase price.

    What are the Benefits of using the land contract you might ask? Well, there are plenty but they include, not having to fix anything, you don’t pay taxes or insurance, payments are predetermined and there are minimal liabilities (asset protection).

    Finally, for the first time you have multiple exit-strategies inherent in your real property investment. I usually ask real estate investors that come in to my office two questions - #1 what is the exit strategy? And #2 did you buy retail, wholesale or discount? In both cases they give me a look like I spoke a foreign language at them. In this system these two threshold concerns are integrated because you have the exit strategies and you are definitely buying discount.

    You or your new buyer could choose to refinance as it behooves them to get conventional financing which may be lower than structured in your land contract. For example, if you had an investment entry point of $23,900 and a $37,900 sales price fixed in your land contract. After a year of timely and seasoned payments the land contract Buyer’s credit is restored. Buyer can refinance property to lower interest rate and cashes out your $37,900 note which creates a high return on investment (ROI).

    Alternatively, since you own this note you might choose to sell it to a note buyer. For example if you have an investment of $29,900 which you sold for $90,000 ($500 down@ $500 per month @ 12% interest) and after the loan seasons for 12 to 18 months you have the option of selling your note in a marketplace that is a trillion dollar industry. So you sell your note for $67,500 (25% discount). But you’ve also received the $5,400 in monthly income for the past year. The combined profit is in Excess of $40,000 or more with the monthly payments and the note sale even though it is discounted. That’s another hard to find ROI particularly if you’re accustomed to market returns from mutual funds and the like.

    You can always just hold because you have an investment of $29,900 with a documented sales price of $60,000 via the land contract.

    This system has been a huge success with waiting lists of approved applicants nationwide just waiting for properties to come available as the secondary buyers. We are watching this program transform families, neighborhoods and communities. In addition to the socially redeeming value of this program, it provides investors with massive advantages. Some of those include:

    1.       Triple Net - Your buyer is responsible for taxes, insurance and maintenance

    2.       Pride of ownership - Your buyer typically improves home and maintains well

    3.       Lower Default - Owners paying the same amount as they would for rent rarely default

    4.       Socially redeeming - You can help a hard working family become home owners

    5.       Cash flow between $450 - $650 - for properties purchased all under $30,000.

    The next five to ten years will be defining and you have the power to change your financial future if you only get off the sidelines and in the game. I played football in college and whether you were at a real game or a practice scrimmage, while you were on the bench at the sidelines you were helpless to change the outcome of the game. It was only when you got in the game and you knew you placed your entire being into the game that you hand control to change an outcome and in effect, you can only take control of your own personal destiny by getting in the game.

    To prove the point that you can be more victorious in a down market you’ll want to take a lesson from the playbook of Floyd Bostwick Odlum. He has been described as “possibly the only man in the United States who made a great fortune out of the Depression.”

    After struggling as a corporate attorney in Salt Lake City, Odlum received an offer to a law clerk at a New York firm, and in 1921 became Vice-President of his primary client, Electric Bond and Share Corporation.

    About 1923, Floyd Odlum and friends along with their wives pooled together a total of $39,600 and formed the United States Company to speculate in purchases of utilities and general securities. Within two years, the company’s net assets had increased 17 fold to nearly $700,000. If Mr. Odlum got started with $39,600 during the Great Depression, can’t you get a few friends or family together and pool funds to get in on this once in a lifetime historical opportunity to purchase discounted REOs at a modern price-point of $29,900? We only see great declines once or twice in our lifetimes and who can predict the next one as this one came without warning; will you have done something by then?

    “Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.” — Thomas Edison, Inventor

    Success Driver,

    James Burns, Esq.

    www.3pillarreo.com

    (949) 440-3243

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • “How to Save Your IRA from Destruction”

    Posted on January 1st, 2009 James No comments

    If you have an IRA and you’re concerned about how to pass it on to your loved ones, an approach of naming a trust as the designated beneficiary has several benefits over directly naming the beneficiaries. The issues that can affect the named beneficiary to name a few are they could be a minor, they might not be careful with money, or they may have marital or creditor issues, and could be disabled to the extent the inheritance would affect their governmental benefits. Next, if the beneficiary dies before distribution, the alternate beneficiaries may not be accurate. Another condition we often see is the beneficiary may purposely or accidentally withdraw monies from the IRA causing adverse tax consequences. Additionally naming the client’s revocable living trust as the beneficiary, even with the appropriate language that extends payout called “conduit provisions” may create issues with the age of beneficiaries in order to “stretch-out” the required minimum distributions.


    However, in 2005, the IRS issued Private Letter Ruling 200537044 (the “PLR”) that approved a new type of revocable trust created solely to be the beneficiary of an IRA account. As a result of this PLR, it is now possible for you to create an individual trust known as an IRA Beneficiary Trust® which provides maximum protection and flexibility for your retirement investments.


    This IRA Beneficiary Trust® insures that your beneficiaries will extend (“stretch-out”) their taxable Minimum Required Distributions (MRDs) on the IRA over a much longer period of time. By using this trust, the age of each beneficiary becomes the effective age for that beneficiary’s required minimum distribution. As an effect, the IRAs can continue to compound for many years free of income-tax and may literally grow to be worth millions of dollars! This type of trust goes by many names and has also been called an IRA trust, an IRA Inheritance Trust, a standalone IRA trust, an IRA stretch trust or an IRA protection trust.When your loved one/s inherit your IRA fund and they keep the funds in the IRA over their lives and only take the minimum required distributions each year (the “stretch-out”), the amount of money that can accumulate and be paid to them should be massive in comparison to taking the monies directly and facing the immediate tax on them. For example, assume you have a $150,000 IRA account; we will also further assume you have two different ages (10 and 25) for your beneficiaries and presume that the account averages an annualized 7% return. First, for the beneficiary who is age 35[i] and inherits IRA proceeds upon your departure, the total benefit is $1,212,165 of after-tax benefit as opposed to $663,496 for taking the proceeds directly without the stretch-out. For the 10 year old beneficiary,[ii] they will receive approximately $4,589,236 after-tax benefit as opposed to $2,641,198 which is what they would receive lacking the stretch-out because of the immediate taxes due when they receive your funds directly.


    Therefore, you can see that this wealth amassing strategy only works if the beneficiaries hold the inherited funds inside the IRA account. If a beneficiary takes all of the funds out of the IRA account (referred to as a “blow-out” because it blows the stretch-out), this wealth accumulation technique is lost. One great reason to create an IRA Beneficiary Trust® is to preserve the stretch-out and prevent a blow-out. Unfortunately, we see this blow-out too often and it jeopardizes wealth that must be saved. Many times your beneficiaries will not be aware of the tax rules and their distribution choices, so they’ll withdraw from the IRA funds at the first opportunity or do a forbidden rollover. Even if you hope that your children or beneficiaries will do the right thing by keeping the funds in the IRA account for their lives to “stretch-out” payments, they may expose it to numerous threats and hope is not a planning strategy as I’ve indicated in my book “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth.”


    Some of the threats come in the form of a divorce where your beneficiary’s spouse could seek half of the inherited IRA if they live in a community property state. The divorce rate is out of control and a huge numbers of inherited money has become a target for the ex-spouse. Even though inherited property is considered separate property it may become the only thing available and because divorces can be very costly and last for years, your beneficiary may succumb to the pressures of long and nasty divorce litigation and be willing to surrender a large portion of the IRA account just to settle the divorce.


    If you have a reasonable IRA you want to pass down or don’t think you’ll need to live on your IRA you absolutely should be thinking about this strategy.


    Untaxingly,

    James Burns, Esq.


    [i] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA. Your tax bracket is 35%, 25 year olds bracket is 28% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less depending on the market and asset class as one could use self-directed and have non-market assets.

    [ii] . Assumptions are $150,000 IRA, your tax bracket is 35%, 10 year olds bracket is 10% at time of transfer and assets only earn 7% which could be more or less as indicated above.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • “Does Your Foreclosing Lender Own Your Loan?”

    Posted on December 5th, 2008 James 1 comment

    These days just about every mortgage is flipped by a lender to another one or sliced up into pools of securitized packages that are sold on Wall Street. The financial engineering helped oil the housing boom by making credit more available. But stalled housing prices and rising defaults have revealed a mess: In the rush to flip paper, lots of the new lenders or pools don’t have the proper paperwork to show they even hold the mortgage.


    A Florida attorney noticed two years ago that nearly all lenders seeking to foreclose against clients were filing “affidavits of lost notes”–essentially requests that a judge assume they own the loan since no proof is at hand.


    What was found by some average snooping was that the company that filed to foreclose didn’t own the loans. The owner was actually a securitized pool of loans overseen by Deutsche Bank (nyse: DB - news - people ). In one particular case documents showing the pool bought a loan after the homeowner defaulted which is an illegal purchase for most pools, including this one.


    In Kansas there was a foreclosure filing with no documents to show the bank owned the loan. In another case, ownership of a loan was recorded on a single date in the name of two different lenders. In March last year Deutsche Bank filed to foreclose on a seven-bedroom home in Worcester, Mass. but it came out that Deutsche was assigned the loan in May or June–that is, after the foreclosure filing. A U.S. bankruptcy court judge in April slammed Deutsche for its “jumble of documents” and ruled the bank could not evict the homeowner.


    For the lenders, a possibly bigger threat on the horizon is that homeowners’ lawyers will bust up the “holder in due course” doctrine that makes it easier for subsequent owners of an IOU to collect. This doctrine says that certain defenses the evictee can use against the original lender (such as predatory lending) cannot be used against an innocent purchaser of the mortgage. The rule is provided for in many federal and state statutes, but a judge could nonetheless find a way to side with the homeowner, particularly if a loan is purchased after it goes into default.


    There may be cases where it makes sense to challenge the lender to show they own your loan. A law firm can assist with this and keep the transaction under the attorney/client privilege so that what you submit cannot be used against you absent a direct court order which is also arguable.


    We always collect the original loan documents and do a forensic audit or request that the bank show they still have them and if they don’t…guess what? We ask them who is the responsible party for a modification and that the client cannot pay someone who is not eligible to receive the payment. Many times the mortgages are even being sold during a default.


    James Burns, Esq.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark
  • “Were You Dumb When Stating Your Income”

    Posted on December 5th, 2008 James No comments

    There is a lot of confusion out there about loan modification and who is going to do the best job…it isn’t a shop but a law firm where you enter into a specific attorney client relationship not a shop that claims to have attorneys they work with. Some prosecutors are now pursuing borrowers as you can read in this article.


    For one, a broker shop can do no distressed borrower any good with the current situation. As you’ll read in the attached article, some prosecutors will be going after borrowers for participating in fraud by overstating their true income. What this does is make your submission to the lender vulnerable unless you have the attorney/client privilege over your submission…hence the modification process should be a legal maneuver not Joe the Modifier who may be a Pirate that has no right to take an advance fee.


    If you must send your clients to a friend who is a broker – make sure they are one of the 18 firms listed on the Department of Real Estate’s website as approved to take an advance fee as many are doing it illegally and offer no real value since they can’t prevent the documents from being used against the borrower because there is no such thing as broker/client privilege.

    http://www.dre.ca.gov/mlb_adv_fees_list.html

    Not everyone will be a loan modification as we are seeing the abuse of the stated income loan in a gross proportion which makes there no way to modify certain loans unless principal was to be drastically reduced which is not happening although it was announced yesterday there is a plan for some principal reduction by the government to find the market bottom; only time will tell.


    LIBOR, COSI, CODI, MTA – these were the indexes of the option arm and then there is the bank’s margin spread which was immense along with the prepayment penalty so the person had to stay locked in for 3 years otherwise they suffer a severe penalty that wipes out most of the equity they would be trying to tap in a refinance or the money they would be trying to save.


    If you have a friend, family member or client you care about who is having trouble making their home payments due to a temporary hardship, please have them go to this site and download the questionnaire and fax it in for a FREE evaluation www.foreclosurelegalsolutions.com.


    In your service,

    James Burns, Esq.

    • Share/Save/Bookmark