Health (scare) Care Reform and an Insidious Tax it Releases

The new Health care reform bill includes a 3.8 percent Medicare tax on unearned income including annuities, and possibly income recognized from the surrender or sale of life insurance.

Many clients have asked how to get out of annuities they don’t need to minimize a potential huge tax hit. This is only if you don’t think you’ll need this income as we can move it to an insurance policy that is free of the tax, leaves a legacy and still provide some income for you and your family.

This strategy spreads out potential tax payments over a 7-year period and moves funds from an existing annuity where funds are trapped and destined for taxes to efficiently transfer your wealth through life Insurance.

The benefit to you is that you keep more of what you earned and leave more to your family who should be the recipients of all your hard work.

Don’t fail to plan or get information on how this might affect you as the outcome could be disastrous.

James Burns

Finance Insurance With Other People’s Money (OPM)

Succession Capital

Using other people’s money (OPM) with the intent to realize a financial gain is a financial concept that has been practiced by real estate developers, investors, business owners, and entrepreneurs for centuries. Most recently, this concept is being utilized to purchase life insurance, and has raised the eyebrows of insurance promoters and financial professionals alike. But, does this concept offer economic substance or is it just another sales tool to sell life insurance?[1]

Life insurance is an important part of any high net worth individual’s financial picture. Since adequate life insurance usually requires significant premium payments, the premium financing strategy can be an effective solution for clients who do not want to liquidate assets to fund their life insurance premiums.

Premium financing is a method of funding the purchase of life insurance for those individuals who have significant net worth and the insurable need, but do not have or want to use liquid capital to pay the premium on a life insurance policy.  By borrowing the money to pay the life insurance premiums with a loan, the insured individual frees up capital that can be used more efficiently.  The use of premium financing may lower out-of-pocket costs and potential gift taxes.

Most lender’s in this space base the current loan interest rate on the one-year London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR), adding a profit margin spread of 175 to 250 basis points. Essentially, lending rates are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the loan amount and the lenders’ risk exposure. Loan interest rates can be fixed on an annual basis, but may vary from year to year, based on fluctuations in LIBOR or changes in the borrower’s financial conditions, which must be updated annually. There was once a yen version that eventually went disastrous when markets changed and if an exit strategy was not built into the plan it could have cost the insured significantly.

There additional fees, such as loan origination fees (commonly 0.5 to 1.25%) of the expected total loan balance), associated with the loan that can offset any savings related to a low interest rate? Often times these fees must be paid up front while some lenders allow them to be financed with the policy premiums. In addition, is the interest variable or fixed, and if variable, how often does it reset? Typically, in most arrangements the interest is a variable rate, with a portion of the interest determined by an index resetting each year, but the spread on top of the index may be fixed for the life of the loan. The 12-month LIBOR is a common index as well as the prime rate. If there is a fixed interest rate, it is important to determine how long it will be fixed. In many instances the fixed rate is only for a certain time period such as five or 10 years. A cap will set on how high the loan interest rate can go during the loan term. So while the loan interest might be variable, there is a cap that will limit how high the interest rate can grow, such as 8%. When the loan interest has both a cap and a floor it is said to have a “collar.” The lender limits how high the loan rate can go, and the borrower agrees that the rate may never go a below a certain amount even if the index with the spread is below that rate. A cap by itself is more expensive than a collar, and the expense is usually expressed in a loan origination fee or in the amount of spread placed in the offer. Caps and collars are generally offered only in fairly sizable loan arrangements, generally in excess of $1 million.

The best candidates for premium-financed life insurance typically have a minimum net worth of $5 million.  Collateral for the loan usually consists of personal assets and can be reduced by the cash value in the policy being financed.

Plan highlights include:

· Target market: at least $5 million estate and a minimum of $100,000 annual life insurance premium

· Frees up business or personal investment capital for more efficient usage.

· Leverages available assets to provide needed insurance coverage with minimal out-of-pocket expenses.

· Potential to reduce gift taxes.

· Loan rate typically tied to a published rate like LIBOR, plus a spread.

· Required collateral can be offset by cash values growing tax-deferred in the policy.

· Can provide substantially greater internal rate of return on the life insurance policy death benefit over non-financed payment methods.

The power of premium financing lies within the same simple concepts related to the leveraging of permanent life insurance for estate liquidity and wealth transfer planning. The key is to evaluate premium financing not as a stand-alone transaction, but as an alternative to the traditional funding of life insurance using the same capital base.

The single greatest misconception is that the client must have an arbitrage opportunity for the financed transaction to provide a benefit over traditional funding. The power of premium financing is based on the leveraging effect created by combining the financing piece with a properly designed life insurance policy so one of the Secret Pillars predominates over the other.[2]

I have been involved in cases where it made sense to not drain cash flow and use leverage to accomplish payments of the life premiums. If the structure is designed properly it can have an exit strategy built in. There is one planning technique for families that have done no estate planning but are uninsurable and have healthy children. This planning tool is too technical to discuss here but if you’re reading this and know someone with over $10,000,000 of net worth without an estate plan and they have an illness, you can have them give my office a call.

Asset Protection Concerns for Hedge Fund Managers

We are currently in an economy where people are running scared and are uncertain. I also think there is a jaded perception where we never give thanks or gratitude for what we have and our fear and panic is all about loss of greed which is not useful. This type of environment leads people to always be dissatisfied with services and investments and many will go to the 12 person lotto (jury) via a lawsuit before you know it.

If anyone thinks I’m speculating just go to the web link at the end to review some of the ridiculous lawsuits and you’ll know we have become a country of whiners who expect to get paid from someone else based on our mistakes. Every month I go here because unlike much of the legal profession I’m for reducing lawsuit abuse Faces of Lawsuit Abuse.

Since my legal work is more about wealth creation or transfer than wealth deletion, we speak with many of the top financial firms and hedge fund managers. I have found in speaking to these financial professionals that many are concerned with being a victim to either a baseless lawsuit or one that could have been settled between the individuals. In times like this you can never satisfy investors when the market goes down or the investment does not work out as expected. It is difficult to perform your profession while a huge black cloud hangs overhead or you try to sleep after an investment tanks and you know the clients will be calling and accusing you of their financial demise as if you personally made the investment go down.

This is when a high quality and legitimate asset protection plan should be integrated into your overall risk management and personal estate/succession plan. All financial planners who advise clients on risk management owe it to their clients to do what they say and be a product of the product by having a proper estate and asset protection plan.

For clarification, asset protection is the use of risk management tools and legal strategies to preserve a person’s wealth so that it is not unfairly confiscated from them in a court proceeding. Because of the litigation lottery where predators go to the 12 person lotto (jury) and other fear and societal norms of solving problems with large pay days in court we see a rise in the abuse of the system and whether you win or not you’re a loser because you’ve had to pay to defend yourself at a cost of time, money and personal unrest.

A recent study of hedge fund professionals revealed that 39.8 percent had been involved in unjust lawsuits or divorce proceedings and 83.3 percent of hedge fund managers had a concern of their own personal wealth derailment through court proceedings. It should be said that it would be very difficult to get a jury of 12 people in this economy that would feel anything but contempt for a hedge fund manager or other wealthy person since they appear filthy rich and easily able to absorb the damages they caused to the poor person who is less fortunate. The case would ready like the quintessential “David meets Goliath” in the eyes of the jury since they are usually comprised of the folks who either don’t work or hate work so they are getting paid to be there by their company through a trial.

The cost of being caught with your pants down can be more than embarrassment and in some instances can wipe 0ut all of the hard work that went into building a business of a family legacy. It most attacks against you it might comes as a Pearl Harbor sneak attack or it might be something you knew was coming but failed to realize the gravity and that someone who thinks you’ve wronged them wants to be vindicated in dollars.

All this can be avoided and what we do every day is help folks incorporate proper tax and risk management strategies into their business, estate and retirement planning because you often do not get a second chance and by the time the complaint is served, it is too late to consider your options to save what you’ve worked for. I have had many professionals with practices they build up over a 20 year period see the light that it all could be lost if this person was to strike a chord with a group of 12 and take away everything.

I leave you with this thought – Q: If you have assets when might a good time to protect them be? A: Right now is the winning answer.

James Burns, Esq.

The Asset Protection Guy

Obama and The Fate of your Estate

We are getting closer to some permanency in terms of future estate tax. US Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D – SD) has stated that  nearly every family, farmer and small business in America will be exempt from paying any estate tax under a bill passed by the House of Representatives on December 3, 2009.

The Permanent Estate Tax Relief for Families, Farmers, and Small Businesses Act of 2009 (HR 4154), authored by Pomeroy, would make  the 2009 estate tax exemption level of USD $3.5m permanent for an individual ($7m for a married couple) and a maximum tax rate of 45%.  The bill also maintains the “step-up in basis” tax rules, which protect many heirs from paying additional capital gains taxes on appreciated assets they inherit.

The bill was approved by 225 votes to 200, but must be passed by the Senate and signed by President Obama before it can become law.

Without change, the estate tax is scheduled to enter one year of full repeal (no taxes at all) in 2010 followed by a return of the estate tax in 2011 with much lower exemption amount ($1,000,000m per person or $2,000,000 for a married couple) and a much higher maximum tax rate (55%)…ouch!!!

The one year of estate tax repeal was also coupled with the enactment of  “carryover basis” tax rules, which will require heirs in 2010 to pay capital gains taxes on inherited assets based on the decedent’s original purchase price.

Under the step-up in basis rules, continued under Pomeroy’s bill, the value of the asset is calculated at the time of the decedent’s death. It is claimed that preserving the step-up in basis rules will protect small businesses from paying an estimated $34,000,000,000 billion in capital gains taxes so who knows if this bill will make it because they could really use this to pay for bailout and TARP funds.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, the continuation of the$7m exemption for couples will help the vast majority of family farmers, as the average farm household’s net worth ranged from $586,000 for small farms to $2,200,000m for very large farms in 2008.

“By making the 2009 estate tax level permanent, we will make the estate tax go away for 99.75% of all percent of families, farmers, and small businesses in this country,” Pomeroy observed, concluding that: “It’s time to resolve this issue once and for all, and this bill is the fair way to do it.”

We so desperately need to know the rules of the game so we can start playing to win it again and hopefully Senate and the President can get on board and make this happen.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Estate Planning and New Estate Tax Laws

There are three estate tax bills on the table and each one makes  you feel like why bother trying to get wealthy if they are going to take it away when I die.

First there is S.722 which is introduced by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., Chairman of the Senate Finance Committe which proposes a freeze on the estate tax exclusion rate at 2009 ($3.5 million per person). S.722 also provides for reunification of the estate and gift tax credit (use $3.5 towards estate or gift tax) and is indexed for inflation.

Also in the House is H.R. 2032, sponsored by Rep. McDermott, D-Wash., who would like to make the estate tax exemption permanent at $2million per person ($4mil for husband and wife) and index for inflation with progressive estate tax rates of 45% for estates valued between $2 million and $5 million; 50% for estates at $5 million to $10 million; and 55% for estates valued over $10 million…makes you want to go out right now and make over $10 million so you can give 55% back to a government that can’t balance its budget and just put a couple trillion worth of bailout money on the equivalent of a credit card.

Finally, there is Bill H. R. 436 which is introduced by yet another Democrat Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. and it would freeze the exclusion at 2009 level (same as above) and reunify the estate and gift tax. However, this nasty pernicious Bill would wack out the opportunities found with Family Limited Parnterships (FLIPs) which is valuation discounts so you can remove highly appreciated assets out of your estate.

You need to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind before they rule on some of the most anti-wealth legislation in recent years punishing those who do well and want to leave a legacy for their family or charity.

In order to protect your assets there is a new form of asset protection which is protection against adverse legislation. Every American’s retirement hangs in the balance especially if you have a large IRA that would run afoul of these potential laws.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Extension on Offshore Account Disclosure

The US Internal Revenue Service has announced an extension of the deadline for special voluntary disclosures by taxpayers with unreported income from offshore accounts.

The extension, announced by the IRS on September 21, gives taxpayers until October 15, 2009, to make a disclosure.

Under special provisions issued in March, taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts originally had until September 23, 2009 to come forward. Those taxpayers who do not voluntarily disclose their hidden accounts by the new deadline face much harsher civil penalties and possible criminal prosecution.

Usually if  the IRS  discovers that a taxpayer has not reported an interest in an offshore account or income on such accounts, the IRS may impose penalties of up to 50% of the balance of each offshore account for each year the account remains undisclosed. The taxpayer will also be liable for additional tax on income earned by the foreign account plus interest on the additional tax. Additional penalties may include a fraud penalty of up to 75% of unpaid taxes and a penalty equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the offshore account balance for willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts form for each offshore account.

Making a disclosure under this program, the taxpayer will be liable for a reduced single penalty equal to 20% of the amount of the offshore account for the one day in the past six years in which the account had the highest aggregate value. However, this penalty could be reduced to just 5% under certain circumstances.

The IRS warned that it has no intention of extending the deadline and those who do not voluntarily disclose shall face the fullest of the penalties.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

It’s A Shame For You Not To Find Money — When These People Do It So Easily

Times are tough and without money it can be a long cold winter until we have economic recovery in this country.

Enter the life Settlement – this is a strategy to take a non-productive or useless insurance policy and turn it into cash today so you can get in on the opportunity that is out there.

WHO BUYS THESE LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES?

Institutions continue to provide the majority of funds to purchase life settlement contracts.  Some more notable players who have participated include Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffett’s firm), Citibank, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and Morgan Stanley.

WHAT KIND OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES ARE THE MOST DESIRABLE?

Universal life and term life insurance policies are the most desirable.

Term policies should still be within their conversion period for maximum value.  Whole life policies are also considered.

HOW SMALL CAN THE POLICY AMOUNT BE?

An amount of $250,000 and greater is preferred, however.

WHAT CAN I EXPECT TO RECEIVE FOR MY POLICY?

Life settlement offers have ranged between 10% and 40% of the policy’s face value. Some offers have been less and some higher—always dependent upon the health of the insured and premium costs.

WHO’S ELIGIBLE?

Eligibility is fairly straightforward:

• The insured must be at least 65 years of age (Age 62 if health is significantly impaired).
• The insured is not terminally ill or have a catastrophic illness.

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO COMPLETE A LIFE SETTLEMENT?

It generally takes 6-8 weeks from the time a completed application package is received until funds are wired into the policy owner’s account.

If you would like to have your policy assessed for settlement please contact my office.

Some of the most common reasons for a life settlement are:

• The premium payments have become too costly
• You may no longer require the policy
• You may be considering the surrender of the policy or the policy may be about to lapse
• There may be a change in your estate planning needs
• You may have a need for liquidity
• You want to give a gift to a family member
• You may need to retire other debt
• You may want to purchase a new less expensive policy
• You may want to generate funds for charitable giving

Common Business Reasons:

• The “Key Man” insurance no longer needed
• The Buy/Sell insurance taken out for the business partners is no longer needed
• Increase liquidity needs for the business
• Eliminate company debt

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Invest Like the Wealthy and Wise

When a judgment is won against a person for a particular amount, the first choice is cash. The next choice would be the quick sale value of real estate, including forcing foreclosure on your home. One of my colleagues still does this work to this day and while he does not enjoy having people removed from their homes, he has to get paid along with his client and that means every asset is up for grabs.

If the bank and other friendly creditors own the property then there is nothing to turn over. At the end of the day, the creditor or their counsel is looking for how much equity you have in the home.

If you are in business or have a sizable estate, you may want to keep your equity lean so that it is off the negotiation table. Stripping equity makes sense on so many accounts. First, we’ve all heard the cliché that it is unwise to have all your eggs in one basket. Why? Because if you drop the basket with all your eggs they are all finished. The old adage is not just for the sake of it but is a wise wealth-making concept. Do you think the folks in Laguna Beach whose homes slide down the side of the hill were better off if the home was completely paid or outside of that home earning interest somewhere or invested in another piece of property? I hope the answer is obvious to you that you would want it outside of that now demolished home so that you had access to it.

Where should I put it you ask? Many readers are using real estate in multiple jurisdictions and this makes sense. You should not keep more than 10% of your equity in the properties unless that would not pencil out properly in having the renter cover your loan. The other significant asset many clients are using is savings grade life insurance because this contract can be structured to not provide for creditors of the beneficiary during a period when you are under attack. You can also put a large amount into a single premium immediate annuity (SPIA) that is irrevocable and you divest your control over it while it pays directly to the insurance company to fund your tax-advantaged savings account, better known as the investment grade life insurance.

If you’re not sure about investments, you can also get personal equity lines from family and friendly companies. A good idea is to get a loan from family members, create a functional promissory not that has flexible payments and higher interest rate for the premium of having the flexibility e.g., pay in lump sum 5 years from now. Then they put a deed of trust on the property and that encumbers a portion of the equity.

This process involves:

A friendly third party that holds a lien on your property.  This friendly party may be a corporation, which you control.  The “friendly” corporation places liens against your real estate and other immovable assets to strip the valuable equity.

HIGH ASSET PROFILE

Before:

Appraised Value $200,000

- $40,000/Mortgage             

+ $160,000 = Equity (at risk)

Now this same asset with an equity strip.

After:

Appraised Value $200,000

- $40,000/Mortgage

- $150,000/ Lien

+ $10,000 = Equity

Real estate is immovable.  Therefore, there are specific challenges to reducing the amount of equity accessible to abusive creditors.  We reduce the equity, through equity stripping.

This process works wonders along with a Delaware Series LLC because you can have a property seeded in one of the Series and another Series that has its own bank account and name as a creditor on the property with a filed deed of trust on the property. You have to create a credible document to substantiate the financial substance but this is done all the time with businesses and real property to keep the ownership reduced.

What if I lose a case and a creditor finds out I control the entity that has a lien against the property. This is one of the little risks but is difficult to lose as long as you run your entity like it has a real business purpose and respect the transaction like it is a true arm’s length dealing.

You can always use a global solution as many of my clients have using a foreign bank to take out up to 90% of the available equity and then settling the money on a trust that has an agreement with the bank to oversee it. The capital never transfers out of the jurisdiction, costs about 1.5% per year on the loan amount to maintain, offers a rate of return on the CD that offsets other fees so it is a wash but it protects property like nobody’s business. There are so many interesting ways to provide for estate taxes, create wealth abroad that is legitimate and protects the money that we can explain them all in this article but we invite any of Rick Stuart’s readers to request an appointment if they have any concerns in their financial and estate planning strategy. Even that little hairline fracture left untreated over time can have cataclysmic results in your financial planning structure.

James Burns

Law Office of James Burns

Is Advanta in Breach of Contract on Credit Cards?

As of July 30, 2009 – Advanta Bank Corp. stated that they were closing all business credit card accounts. They cited in the letters that went out that an independent trust which owned the balances cards and provides funding for new transactions was pulling out. As such, you need to keeping paying your balance but Advanta will be unable to provide further credit.

Now under basic contract law which is the thread between your agreement with credit card companies there is an offer, acceptance and consideration. Advanta offered me credit and I accepted and the consideration is the the act of providing credit with my obligation to pay it back with interest. Now, as a result of Advanta losing a trust that was funding these, they suddenly are in breach in my mind and as a result, they are asking me to modify my agreement without new consideration which is a requirement to modify the terms of any agreement.

A breach occurs when the bargained-for exchange is not honored by the other party, in this case Advanta Bank Corp. I believe I’m entitled to an order of performance which is the extension of credit otherwise what incentive do I have to pay back any balance on this card? They have not offered me additional consideration like to pay less or go without interest and I think this is not only a breach but unconscionable that Advanta could not act it good faith and fair dealing and assumes the public is stupid and unaware of their rights.

I implore all consumers, if your card is cut off please get a copy of your original agreement and all addendum and see if they have the ability to do this or take the credit card company to arbitration since they make that a part of the agreement. I intend to call and get my card settled for a lot less since they are in non-performance and breaching their agreement.

Wake up and take back your power and let them know you’re not going to be insulted and slapped around any longer. Chime in and let us know about your credit card stink by leaving a message below.

Sincerely,

James Burns, Esq.

Guaranteed Modification

A lot of people tell me about companies that offer a guarantee for modification services and my reply  is: “who do you know that has called them on it?” There is usually dead silence because how good is a guarantee? It is only as good as a company is prepared to honor it so examine all the small print. There are not many companies that can afford to expend resources on a modification win or lose and not get compensated.

From the law office standpoint I liken it to the same set of circumstances as if I was to represent a person in court, I cannot guarantee the outcome and to do so is unethical because you, the client might not give me all the facts or can withhold information about trying to do it on your own previously and then we try and encounter huge obstacles. I’ve had clients that did their own submissions and failed (because they gave too much or wrong information) and they don’t tell us and then we meet with resistance. Now we’ve been able to get them through but because this happens there is no way to guarantee the outcome and we expend thousands of dollars of time and effort in each case so we just cannot offer a refund. Our guarantee is best efforts and if your situation is modifiable you’ll get modified and we don’t even need to go there about rejection and if that happens, maybe it is exactly what needs to happen because not only does the person not qualify for the home now, they won’t be able to afford it with any program so they should think short sale and move on. Many properties will not make sense and most banks do not offer a principal reduction because they cannot get permission from their investors to eat that much of their expected profits. The old adage of when does a negative -30 + 43 = 0 and that is any time the market goes down 30% it has to get back to 43% just to put you back where you were before it dropped.  I see many instances where the properties are down 50% and the borrower might now recover the home value in their life time and getting out with a short sale really makes financial sense.

On the fees, if you’re using a law firm and they are going to give it to you for a fixed fee, grab that and run if it is around $3,000 to $4,000. When I was at a law firm we had software that started to calculate our hourly from the time the phone was picked up until we hung it up and we were taught to keep the client on the phone and run it up. Every fax that went out was $1.00 per page and every photo-copy was .30 cents per page.  The hourly of an experienced real estate or finance attorney is going to be $375.00 per hour or more and they may have processors or paralegals that are going to be $100 to $150 per hour. When you average 40 to 100 hours per file you are going to get your money’s worth because it takes hour upon hour and constant follow-up with the banks…more than most people who work will every have. I can’t see a modification starting out less than $5,500 under typical law firm billing and the client could expect to get a back-end invoice for about the same because of the time and expenses for faxing, photo-copying and FedEx that takes place. Therefore, a completed modification would normally be upwards of $10,000 by the time it is done. Grab a modification for a fixed $3,000 to $4,000 because it is a super deal.

You can always go to a non-lawyer but you are really putting yourself in a position to have your documents used against you since a broker or any other helper cannot afford you the attorney/client privilege. You need to make sure your submission is not used as a smoking gun against you especially if you were a stated income loan and you and your broker or loan officer expanded your income for the purpose of qualifying on the loan.

If you want solid assistance at a fixed legal fee price, please contact my office.

Sincerely,

James Burns, Esq.