Don’t Let Late Accounts Put You out of Business

In this current economy I see more businesses with late accounts and they need to get on them before the other business goes out of business. We are seeing record filings of both personal and corporate bankruptcy filings. If you find yourself on the back burner you may want to become a squeaky wheel before they don’t have anything left to pay you.

This is where we come in. A Law center that does collections and can either focus on keeping your client with accounts receivable management or take things to a legal resolution with pre-judgment seizure and liens is also possible as a means to persuade the creditor to make payments. This can shut down their business until they pay by making their assets captive.

Don’t wait in this economy when things are 60 days late your chance of recovery go way down to 60% chance.

Also, when working with a company make sure they guarantee some form of results as many can just get in the way and legal tools are often costly unless absolutely necessary.

We like to give a 7 Day guarantee on results or the account is released. By day 7 something substantial will be taking place in getting you paid or it is truly noncollectable. We have had great success with debts that were a year old and it amazed the company when these old accounts started paying again…new found cash flow which enriched their bottom line.

If they are still in business it might not be too late to get them to pay you so don’t just write it off, get paid and change your cash flow for the month.

With over 40 years of collections on an international level with a network of attorneys and private investigators we can help you.

James Burns, Esq.

866 -472-7347

To Dream the Impossible Dream - Beating the Stock Market

A few years ago after reviewing some portfolios for clients that tried their hand in stock market trading it was obvious to me that they were gambling as if they were at the roulette table in Vegas. As someone who has worked for a billionaire and observed the asset class relative to stock, the investments were safe blue chip stocks, bonds, Treasuries and Index funds because it is next to impossible to beat the market.  I then wrote my first book The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth that discusses the fundamentals of what is an investment and what to look for every-time you start to consider an investment.  Benjamin Graham who was the mentor of Warren Buffet stated an investment was something that preserved principal and provided and adequate return.

In the book we also discuss John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard Investments, views on investing and trying to beat the market. Mr. Bogle’s academic research proved that virtually no one could consistently beat the market over long stretches (like the 35 years we have to invest for retirement). The best you could hope for was to meet the market, which gave you returns that weren’t half bad. in my book we recount the research of looking at 355 mutual funds over the 35 years and that only 3 of them did anything compelling and that was in line with what the S&P 500 did. Hence, the idea is that going forward how would the average person who works uncover those 3 funds out of the masses; you can’t is the answer.

To this end, Mr. Bogle said we need to invest in a broad swath of stocks and bonds through low-cost index funds and forget about your portfolio. Spend your time living your life instead of researching stocks and bonds. That’s much more fun than sweating over investments anyway. If you’re going to research anything it would be real estate and starting your own business as other assets.

The other pundit of the idea that almost no one beats the market is Terrance Odean, a Berkeley professor who proved Bogle’s theory from another perspective. The more you trade, the more you lose, Odean discovered by examining the real-life portfolios and trading patterns of thousands of investors. His paper, Boys Will Be Boys, is a must-read for anyone who is trying to retire in comfort and not run out of money and for those who think they’re going to outsmart the stock market. You know the guys who have a super large screen in their office and they seem to be following the market and making trades. What they are really doing is creating taxes with capital gains and many of them short term which costs more, all for what?

Steady and consistent gets to the finish line if we remember what Aesop tried to teach us in the story of the Tortoise and the Hare. The best way to invest with success is to get base hits and not try to get a home run all the time. If we look at baseball, a home run is great but really you accomplish more if you get a base hit and move it one base at a time to home plate; this is better than striking out.

James Burns, Esq.

Survival of the Smartest in Retirement

An estimated 47 percent of Americans born between 1948 and 1954 may not be able to afford basic expenses and uninsured health-care costs through retirement, according to the Washington-based Employee Benefit Research Institute. EBRI has a database of 24 million 401(k) participants and 20 million Individual Retirement Accounts.

“The risk of outliving one’s assets in retirement, or longevity risk, has been placed squarely on the shoulders of workers,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi said in testimony for the hearing. The life expectancy of a 65-year- old U.S. male is 82, and 85 for a 65-year-old female, according to the Social Security Administration.

There are solutions for guaranteed income contracts for life which makes sense to add to your planning. This provides predictability on outcome rather than riding the roller coaster of the market.

James Burns, Esq.

Was Gary Coleman’s Plug Pulled Without His Will?

As Gary Coleman was unconscious in the hospital, his ex-wife, Shannon, gave the order to pull the plug.  Now Coleman’s parents have come forward accusing the hospital of stopping the life support prematurely without the proper permission, saying Shannon no longer had the right as she was not his wife.  The hospital does not seem to be concerned because Gary had his health care power of attorney on file (AKA: living will) giving Shannon the authority as his Agent.  This is a case to get your affairs in order like NOW.  Have you signed your own health care power of attorney?

Get answers:

James Burns, Esq.

(949) 440-3243

Health (scare) Care Reform and an Insidious Tax it Releases

The new Health care reform bill includes a 3.8 percent Medicare tax on unearned income including annuities, and possibly income recognized from the surrender or sale of life insurance.

Many clients have asked how to get out of annuities they don’t need to minimize a potential huge tax hit. This is only if you don’t think you’ll need this income as we can move it to an insurance policy that is free of the tax, leaves a legacy and still provide some income for you and your family.

This strategy spreads out potential tax payments over a 7-year period and moves funds from an existing annuity where funds are trapped and destined for taxes to efficiently transfer your wealth through life Insurance.

The benefit to you is that you keep more of what you earned and leave more to your family who should be the recipients of all your hard work.

Don’t fail to plan or get information on how this might affect you as the outcome could be disastrous.

James Burns

Finance Insurance With Other People’s Money (OPM)

Succession Capital

Using other people’s money (OPM) with the intent to realize a financial gain is a financial concept that has been practiced by real estate developers, investors, business owners, and entrepreneurs for centuries. Most recently, this concept is being utilized to purchase life insurance, and has raised the eyebrows of insurance promoters and financial professionals alike. But, does this concept offer economic substance or is it just another sales tool to sell life insurance?[1]

Life insurance is an important part of any high net worth individual’s financial picture. Since adequate life insurance usually requires significant premium payments, the premium financing strategy can be an effective solution for clients who do not want to liquidate assets to fund their life insurance premiums.

Premium financing is a method of funding the purchase of life insurance for those individuals who have significant net worth and the insurable need, but do not have or want to use liquid capital to pay the premium on a life insurance policy.  By borrowing the money to pay the life insurance premiums with a loan, the insured individual frees up capital that can be used more efficiently.  The use of premium financing may lower out-of-pocket costs and potential gift taxes.

Most lender’s in this space base the current loan interest rate on the one-year London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR), adding a profit margin spread of 175 to 250 basis points. Essentially, lending rates are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the loan amount and the lenders’ risk exposure. Loan interest rates can be fixed on an annual basis, but may vary from year to year, based on fluctuations in LIBOR or changes in the borrower’s financial conditions, which must be updated annually. There was once a yen version that eventually went disastrous when markets changed and if an exit strategy was not built into the plan it could have cost the insured significantly.

There additional fees, such as loan origination fees (commonly 0.5 to 1.25%) of the expected total loan balance), associated with the loan that can offset any savings related to a low interest rate? Often times these fees must be paid up front while some lenders allow them to be financed with the policy premiums. In addition, is the interest variable or fixed, and if variable, how often does it reset? Typically, in most arrangements the interest is a variable rate, with a portion of the interest determined by an index resetting each year, but the spread on top of the index may be fixed for the life of the loan. The 12-month LIBOR is a common index as well as the prime rate. If there is a fixed interest rate, it is important to determine how long it will be fixed. In many instances the fixed rate is only for a certain time period such as five or 10 years. A cap will set on how high the loan interest rate can go during the loan term. So while the loan interest might be variable, there is a cap that will limit how high the interest rate can grow, such as 8%. When the loan interest has both a cap and a floor it is said to have a “collar.” The lender limits how high the loan rate can go, and the borrower agrees that the rate may never go a below a certain amount even if the index with the spread is below that rate. A cap by itself is more expensive than a collar, and the expense is usually expressed in a loan origination fee or in the amount of spread placed in the offer. Caps and collars are generally offered only in fairly sizable loan arrangements, generally in excess of $1 million.

The best candidates for premium-financed life insurance typically have a minimum net worth of $5 million.  Collateral for the loan usually consists of personal assets and can be reduced by the cash value in the policy being financed.

Plan highlights include:

· Target market: at least $5 million estate and a minimum of $100,000 annual life insurance premium

· Frees up business or personal investment capital for more efficient usage.

· Leverages available assets to provide needed insurance coverage with minimal out-of-pocket expenses.

· Potential to reduce gift taxes.

· Loan rate typically tied to a published rate like LIBOR, plus a spread.

· Required collateral can be offset by cash values growing tax-deferred in the policy.

· Can provide substantially greater internal rate of return on the life insurance policy death benefit over non-financed payment methods.

The power of premium financing lies within the same simple concepts related to the leveraging of permanent life insurance for estate liquidity and wealth transfer planning. The key is to evaluate premium financing not as a stand-alone transaction, but as an alternative to the traditional funding of life insurance using the same capital base.

The single greatest misconception is that the client must have an arbitrage opportunity for the financed transaction to provide a benefit over traditional funding. The power of premium financing is based on the leveraging effect created by combining the financing piece with a properly designed life insurance policy so one of the Secret Pillars predominates over the other.[2]

I have been involved in cases where it made sense to not drain cash flow and use leverage to accomplish payments of the life premiums. If the structure is designed properly it can have an exit strategy built in. There is one planning technique for families that have done no estate planning but are uninsurable and have healthy children. This planning tool is too technical to discuss here but if you’re reading this and know someone with over $10,000,000 of net worth without an estate plan and they have an illness, you can have them give my office a call.

Asset Protection Concerns for Hedge Fund Managers

We are currently in an economy where people are running scared and are uncertain. I also think there is a jaded perception where we never give thanks or gratitude for what we have and our fear and panic is all about loss of greed which is not useful. This type of environment leads people to always be dissatisfied with services and investments and many will go to the 12 person lotto (jury) via a lawsuit before you know it.

If anyone thinks I’m speculating just go to the web link at the end to review some of the ridiculous lawsuits and you’ll know we have become a country of whiners who expect to get paid from someone else based on our mistakes. Every month I go here because unlike much of the legal profession I’m for reducing lawsuit abuse Faces of Lawsuit Abuse.

Since my legal work is more about wealth creation or transfer than wealth deletion, we speak with many of the top financial firms and hedge fund managers. I have found in speaking to these financial professionals that many are concerned with being a victim to either a baseless lawsuit or one that could have been settled between the individuals. In times like this you can never satisfy investors when the market goes down or the investment does not work out as expected. It is difficult to perform your profession while a huge black cloud hangs overhead or you try to sleep after an investment tanks and you know the clients will be calling and accusing you of their financial demise as if you personally made the investment go down.

This is when a high quality and legitimate asset protection plan should be integrated into your overall risk management and personal estate/succession plan. All financial planners who advise clients on risk management owe it to their clients to do what they say and be a product of the product by having a proper estate and asset protection plan.

For clarification, asset protection is the use of risk management tools and legal strategies to preserve a person’s wealth so that it is not unfairly confiscated from them in a court proceeding. Because of the litigation lottery where predators go to the 12 person lotto (jury) and other fear and societal norms of solving problems with large pay days in court we see a rise in the abuse of the system and whether you win or not you’re a loser because you’ve had to pay to defend yourself at a cost of time, money and personal unrest.

A recent study of hedge fund professionals revealed that 39.8 percent had been involved in unjust lawsuits or divorce proceedings and 83.3 percent of hedge fund managers had a concern of their own personal wealth derailment through court proceedings. It should be said that it would be very difficult to get a jury of 12 people in this economy that would feel anything but contempt for a hedge fund manager or other wealthy person since they appear filthy rich and easily able to absorb the damages they caused to the poor person who is less fortunate. The case would ready like the quintessential “David meets Goliath” in the eyes of the jury since they are usually comprised of the folks who either don’t work or hate work so they are getting paid to be there by their company through a trial.

The cost of being caught with your pants down can be more than embarrassment and in some instances can wipe 0ut all of the hard work that went into building a business of a family legacy. It most attacks against you it might comes as a Pearl Harbor sneak attack or it might be something you knew was coming but failed to realize the gravity and that someone who thinks you’ve wronged them wants to be vindicated in dollars.

All this can be avoided and what we do every day is help folks incorporate proper tax and risk management strategies into their business, estate and retirement planning because you often do not get a second chance and by the time the complaint is served, it is too late to consider your options to save what you’ve worked for. I have had many professionals with practices they build up over a 20 year period see the light that it all could be lost if this person was to strike a chord with a group of 12 and take away everything.

I leave you with this thought - Q: If you have assets when might a good time to protect them be? A: Right now is the winning answer.

James Burns, Esq.

The Asset Protection Guy

Obama and The Fate of your Estate

We are getting closer to some permanency in terms of future estate tax. US Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D - SD) has stated that  nearly every family, farmer and small business in America will be exempt from paying any estate tax under a bill passed by the House of Representatives on December 3, 2009.

The Permanent Estate Tax Relief for Families, Farmers, and Small Businesses Act of 2009 (HR 4154), authored by Pomeroy, would make  the 2009 estate tax exemption level of USD $3.5m permanent for an individual ($7m for a married couple) and a maximum tax rate of 45%.  The bill also maintains the “step-up in basis” tax rules, which protect many heirs from paying additional capital gains taxes on appreciated assets they inherit.

The bill was approved by 225 votes to 200, but must be passed by the Senate and signed by President Obama before it can become law.

Without change, the estate tax is scheduled to enter one year of full repeal (no taxes at all) in 2010 followed by a return of the estate tax in 2011 with much lower exemption amount ($1,000,000m per person or $2,000,000 for a married couple) and a much higher maximum tax rate (55%)…ouch!!!

The one year of estate tax repeal was also coupled with the enactment of  “carryover basis” tax rules, which will require heirs in 2010 to pay capital gains taxes on inherited assets based on the decedent’s original purchase price.

Under the step-up in basis rules, continued under Pomeroy’s bill, the value of the asset is calculated at the time of the decedent’s death. It is claimed that preserving the step-up in basis rules will protect small businesses from paying an estimated $34,000,000,000 billion in capital gains taxes so who knows if this bill will make it because they could really use this to pay for bailout and TARP funds.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, the continuation of the$7m exemption for couples will help the vast majority of family farmers, as the average farm household’s net worth ranged from $586,000 for small farms to $2,200,000m for very large farms in 2008.

“By making the 2009 estate tax level permanent, we will make the estate tax go away for 99.75% of all percent of families, farmers, and small businesses in this country,” Pomeroy observed, concluding that: “It’s time to resolve this issue once and for all, and this bill is the fair way to do it.”

We so desperately need to know the rules of the game so we can start playing to win it again and hopefully Senate and the President can get on board and make this happen.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Estate Planning and New Estate Tax Laws

There are three estate tax bills on the table and each one makes  you feel like why bother trying to get wealthy if they are going to take it away when I die.

First there is S.722 which is introduced by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., Chairman of the Senate Finance Committe which proposes a freeze on the estate tax exclusion rate at 2009 ($3.5 million per person). S.722 also provides for reunification of the estate and gift tax credit (use $3.5 towards estate or gift tax) and is indexed for inflation.

Also in the House is H.R. 2032, sponsored by Rep. McDermott, D-Wash., who would like to make the estate tax exemption permanent at $2million per person ($4mil for husband and wife) and index for inflation with progressive estate tax rates of 45% for estates valued between $2 million and $5 million; 50% for estates at $5 million to $10 million; and 55% for estates valued over $10 million…makes you want to go out right now and make over $10 million so you can give 55% back to a government that can’t balance its budget and just put a couple trillion worth of bailout money on the equivalent of a credit card.

Finally, there is Bill H. R. 436 which is introduced by yet another Democrat Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. and it would freeze the exclusion at 2009 level (same as above) and reunify the estate and gift tax. However, this nasty pernicious Bill would wack out the opportunities found with Family Limited Parnterships (FLIPs) which is valuation discounts so you can remove highly appreciated assets out of your estate.

You need to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind before they rule on some of the most anti-wealth legislation in recent years punishing those who do well and want to leave a legacy for their family or charity.

In order to protect your assets there is a new form of asset protection which is protection against adverse legislation. Every American’s retirement hangs in the balance especially if you have a large IRA that would run afoul of these potential laws.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Extension on Offshore Account Disclosure

The US Internal Revenue Service has announced an extension of the deadline for special voluntary disclosures by taxpayers with unreported income from offshore accounts.

The extension, announced by the IRS on September 21, gives taxpayers until October 15, 2009, to make a disclosure.

Under special provisions issued in March, taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts originally had until September 23, 2009 to come forward. Those taxpayers who do not voluntarily disclose their hidden accounts by the new deadline face much harsher civil penalties and possible criminal prosecution.

Usually if  the IRS  discovers that a taxpayer has not reported an interest in an offshore account or income on such accounts, the IRS may impose penalties of up to 50% of the balance of each offshore account for each year the account remains undisclosed. The taxpayer will also be liable for additional tax on income earned by the foreign account plus interest on the additional tax. Additional penalties may include a fraud penalty of up to 75% of unpaid taxes and a penalty equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the offshore account balance for willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts form for each offshore account.

Making a disclosure under this program, the taxpayer will be liable for a reduced single penalty equal to 20% of the amount of the offshore account for the one day in the past six years in which the account had the highest aggregate value. However, this penalty could be reduced to just 5% under certain circumstances.

The IRS warned that it has no intention of extending the deadline and those who do not voluntarily disclose shall face the fullest of the penalties.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.