Obama and The Fate of your Estate

We are getting closer to some permanency in terms of future estate tax. US Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D – SD) has stated that  nearly every family, farmer and small business in America will be exempt from paying any estate tax under a bill passed by the House of Representatives on December 3, 2009.

The Permanent Estate Tax Relief for Families, Farmers, and Small Businesses Act of 2009 (HR 4154), authored by Pomeroy, would make  the 2009 estate tax exemption level of USD $3.5m permanent for an individual ($7m for a married couple) and a maximum tax rate of 45%.  The bill also maintains the “step-up in basis” tax rules, which protect many heirs from paying additional capital gains taxes on appreciated assets they inherit.

The bill was approved by 225 votes to 200, but must be passed by the Senate and signed by President Obama before it can become law.

Without change, the estate tax is scheduled to enter one year of full repeal (no taxes at all) in 2010 followed by a return of the estate tax in 2011 with much lower exemption amount ($1,000,000m per person or $2,000,000 for a married couple) and a much higher maximum tax rate (55%)…ouch!!!

The one year of estate tax repeal was also coupled with the enactment of  “carryover basis” tax rules, which will require heirs in 2010 to pay capital gains taxes on inherited assets based on the decedent’s original purchase price.

Under the step-up in basis rules, continued under Pomeroy’s bill, the value of the asset is calculated at the time of the decedent’s death. It is claimed that preserving the step-up in basis rules will protect small businesses from paying an estimated $34,000,000,000 billion in capital gains taxes so who knows if this bill will make it because they could really use this to pay for bailout and TARP funds.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, the continuation of the$7m exemption for couples will help the vast majority of family farmers, as the average farm household’s net worth ranged from $586,000 for small farms to $2,200,000m for very large farms in 2008.

“By making the 2009 estate tax level permanent, we will make the estate tax go away for 99.75% of all percent of families, farmers, and small businesses in this country,” Pomeroy observed, concluding that: “It’s time to resolve this issue once and for all, and this bill is the fair way to do it.”

We so desperately need to know the rules of the game so we can start playing to win it again and hopefully Senate and the President can get on board and make this happen.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

Estate Planning and New Estate Tax Laws

There are three estate tax bills on the table and each one makes  you feel like why bother trying to get wealthy if they are going to take it away when I die.

First there is S.722 which is introduced by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., Chairman of the Senate Finance Committe which proposes a freeze on the estate tax exclusion rate at 2009 ($3.5 million per person). S.722 also provides for reunification of the estate and gift tax credit (use $3.5 towards estate or gift tax) and is indexed for inflation.

Also in the House is H.R. 2032, sponsored by Rep. McDermott, D-Wash., who would like to make the estate tax exemption permanent at $2million per person ($4mil for husband and wife) and index for inflation with progressive estate tax rates of 45% for estates valued between $2 million and $5 million; 50% for estates at $5 million to $10 million; and 55% for estates valued over $10 million…makes you want to go out right now and make over $10 million so you can give 55% back to a government that can’t balance its budget and just put a couple trillion worth of bailout money on the equivalent of a credit card.

Finally, there is Bill H. R. 436 which is introduced by yet another Democrat Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. and it would freeze the exclusion at 2009 level (same as above) and reunify the estate and gift tax. However, this nasty pernicious Bill would wack out the opportunities found with Family Limited Parnterships (FLIPs) which is valuation discounts so you can remove highly appreciated assets out of your estate.

You need to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind before they rule on some of the most anti-wealth legislation in recent years punishing those who do well and want to leave a legacy for their family or charity.

In order to protect your assets there is a new form of asset protection which is protection against adverse legislation. Every American’s retirement hangs in the balance especially if you have a large IRA that would run afoul of these potential laws.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.

“Six Secrets of How Wealthy Landowners Protect Themselves From Lawsuits”

I recently read that a lawsuit is filed every 13 minutes of every working day in California and this disease is proliferating throughout the country.

In addition, the toxic substance and mold litigation is on a rise with multi-million dollar verdicts against the landowners.

Over 80 million lawsuits are filed each year in the U.S. Each year trial attorneys create new causes of action aimed at the perceived deep pockets of businesses and individuals. For instance, most people are familiar with the infamous McDonald’s hot coffee case and lately, the mold cases. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on January 22, 2003, that tenants of an apartment building in Hayward are suing the owner for five million dollars for mold related injuries. Mold damage awards in recent cases have been so great that the major property insurance companies are reluctant to write policies in California. It may be a limitation or exclusion in your policy.

Mistake Number One – Not understanding the implications of how you own your real property.

The inexperienced landowner holds all their property as themselves, jointly, or as “joint tenants”. In some cases this can work, but in many cases it can be the cause of an expensive and devastating mistake.

With the proliferation of mold cases mounting, it is a best practice to not hold investment property in your own name because insurance will not cover these claims.

The wealthy and experienced real estate investor knows that they have to use a limited liability entity to hold the property creating a prophylactic between themselves and any liabilities stemming from the property.

Mistake Number Two – Not knowing which estate-planning document to use so you’ll avoid lawsuits

Should I use a revocable or irrevocable trust and should it be domestic or foreign?

A lot of folks don’t know that a revocable trust is only for avoiding probate but offers no creditor protection.

Depending on timing when a person is sued, there are great opportunities with the right irrevocable domestic trust. On the other hand, there are some really great offshore solutions that allow you to participate in the global equity markets and are experiencing much higher gains than the U.S. market.

There is also one super investment tool that is protected and avoids capital gains providing far better returns than mutual funds and independent stock investments.

The experienced real estate investor knows that they should put their home into a plan that will not affect their tax benefits but still render solid protection from a creditor by using the right tool.

Mistake Number Three – Holding Too Much Equity in Your Home.

If a creditor can’t get at cash, they go after real estate. The best place to start is with the roof over your head. Most states are experiencing record appreciation which means there is a lot of equity in many homes.

But how much interest is this equity earning? There are products where you could be investing some of the equity proceeds and earning more than you’re paying for the loan. The wealth minded landowner leverages everything, earns on that leverage and tries to reduce ownership.

Some superior mortgage products are on the market that will keep your equity down while you live in the home. At first blush, it sounds contrary to common thinking. Nonetheless, the wealthy person puts everything at their disposal to work to create extraordinary wealth, even home equity.

Doesn’t it make more sense to tie the money up in investments that earn and keep your home safe?

Mistake Number Four – Not Keeping Adequate Property Insurance

A good insurance policy can provide a solid first line of defense. However, you must be aware of its limitations.

General business insurance policies insure against accidents on the business property such as slip and falls and fire and equipment malfunction. These policies often exclude accidents occurring outside the scope of employment, an intentional act by an owner or employee, contract claims and working at home.

Liability policies for professionals such as doctors, dentists, attorneys, architects, engineers and accountants also have exclusions from coverage such as grossly negligent acts, willful or wanton misconduct, punitive damages and liability related to product liability.

Personal liability insurance policies include auto, homeowners and umbrella coverage. If a plaintiff’s damages exceed your auto policy limits, you will be personally liable for the balance. Homeowner’s insurance policies provide insurance for damage to the residence caused by acts of God, insects and often construction defects. The policies often exclude coverage for any business activities at the home. Umbrella insurance policies are a relatively inexpensive way to supplement auto and homeowners policy limits, but they are not complete. Umbrella policies generally exclude coverage for dangerous sports, dangerous equipment such as guns, trampolines, swimming pools and sometimes lawn mowers, chain saws and power tools. In addition, such policies may exclude dog bites, intentional acts and business activities.

Another problem with relying exclusively on insurance is the risk that your insurance company may not be in business when you file a claim. The Wall Street Journal reported on January 30, 2003, that a rash of insolvencies among insurers is resulting in hundreds of thousands of consumers at risk of not collecting on their claims. The problem is growing as more and more insurance companies are filing for bankruptcy.

While insurance is a good first step, it not always reliable. The experienced real estate investor never relies on one tool but uses all tools in their tool belt to protect themselves.

Mistake Number Five- Not Avoiding Probate

Multiple Probates. If you have real property in multiple states, then you will have to probate the property in each state.  That means attorney fees in each state, potentially larger probate fees in other states, and the administrative burden of multiple state probates. The average is 3% to 8% of the gross estate, if you compound this by five or more states your estate is in trouble.

Along with protective features, a good plan should tie into your estate plan so that you avoid multiple probates. Our office and the tools we use on a daily basis to take care of clients can accomplish this very easily.

Mistake Number Six - Procrastinating

This is likely the biggest and most costly mistake the novice real property investor makes. The wealthy real property investor always takes out time to do proper planning because the alternative could be catastrophic.

If you want to avoid these outcomes, you need to take a little bit of time out of your schedule and plan.

The truth is with proper planning almost anyone can dramatically improve their estate, business and retirement plan.

Due to the complexities of estate preservation planning (“Asset Protection”) and the many changes slated to occur, it’s extremely difficult to explain each application of these strategies here in print.

While one client may be able to benefit from a strategy by using it one way, another client may be able to benefit from a different application of the same strategy. Everyone’s situation is like a snowflake, no two are alike.

If any of these strategies make as much sense to you as they have for America’s wealthiest landowners, then we invite you to contact us for more information on how to do the same.

You can also find out more by reading the “The 3 Secret Pillars of Wealth” which is sold at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Borders and other fine book stores.

James Burns, Esq.

www.jamesgburns.com

Extension on Offshore Account Disclosure

The US Internal Revenue Service has announced an extension of the deadline for special voluntary disclosures by taxpayers with unreported income from offshore accounts.

The extension, announced by the IRS on September 21, gives taxpayers until October 15, 2009, to make a disclosure.

Under special provisions issued in March, taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts originally had until September 23, 2009 to come forward. Those taxpayers who do not voluntarily disclose their hidden accounts by the new deadline face much harsher civil penalties and possible criminal prosecution.

Usually if  the IRS  discovers that a taxpayer has not reported an interest in an offshore account or income on such accounts, the IRS may impose penalties of up to 50% of the balance of each offshore account for each year the account remains undisclosed. The taxpayer will also be liable for additional tax on income earned by the foreign account plus interest on the additional tax. Additional penalties may include a fraud penalty of up to 75% of unpaid taxes and a penalty equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the offshore account balance for willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts form for each offshore account.

Making a disclosure under this program, the taxpayer will be liable for a reduced single penalty equal to 20% of the amount of the offshore account for the one day in the past six years in which the account had the highest aggregate value. However, this penalty could be reduced to just 5% under certain circumstances.

The IRS warned that it has no intention of extending the deadline and those who do not voluntarily disclose shall face the fullest of the penalties.

Untaxingly,

James Burns, Esq.